Re: Macro argument evaluation, and function return value evaluation?

Well, I'm still interested in the above questions, but now I realized that spec is even harder to extend, since s/keys doesn't even truly take a standard map of keys and vectors, the vector can have an `or` in it, which is a non standard or, so a default eval does not handle it properly.

Macro argument evaluation, and function return value evaluation?

I feel these have been asked many times, but no answers I could find was complete, or satisfactory. 1) How do you, within a macro, choose to evaluate an argument? So imagine I wanted a macro which had applicative order of evaluation? Not a macro that returns a function which will be evaluated