reminds me of http://is.gd/shinyscript
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
Thanks for the advice and support everyone! I'm not hopeful at being able to
sway him to a parenthetical language through logic (I've tried!)
Additionally, I definitely would not consider throwing out unmaintainable
decompiled Java code on the sly. That, as Nicolas pointed out, would be the
I'm in a bit of a bind-- I've written some really nice Clojure code for
dealing with Genomic sequences that works as well or better than the
reference implementation we currently use where I work. However, the the
hierarchy has recently changed and my new boss is requiring me to have all
code in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
compile to java class, decompile to java source. works in theory,
until someone actually looks at the source ;)
btw, your new boss is ... not the type of boss that would keep me from
looking for a new job.
Am 29.09.2011 20:09, schrieb Dennis
Oups, you just have been dilberted in a non creative dimension :)
I would go for the bytecode decompilation option, most probably your new boss
will not even notice according to the Dilbert workplace rules.
He most probably pushes is desk away when his mouse hits the border of his
mouse pad
Best would be to act as professionnal:
- try to convince your new boss of the benefits of using clojure from
a business point of view.
- if this fail, either go back to writing java or quit.
But do not try to abuse your boss and company by developping in
clojure behind the scene and deliver some
There isn't an easy solution right now but I think it's worth the
effort producing something there. You might want to join the
discussion over here: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/t/5da63583815b6102
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
It may be easier to convince him by explaining how much time it is
going to cost to do conversion. Abstract computer science terminology
isn't always that convincing to managers, but explaining how much time
will be wasted is.
On Sep 29, 6:56 pm, Nicolas bousque...@gmail.com wrote:
Best would
