Would it still bother you if the IDE helped maintain the ns declaration?
IMHO, having to rely on my editor or an IDE to manage my code would be a
language design smell.
Not that I would mind a little help here and there, though -- e.g.
indentation, completion and a message if there seem
On Saturday, July 27, 2013 4:46:06 PM UTC-7, Alex Baranosky wrote:
On our work projects at Runa, we have an unwritten code standard of
always
writing out the full namespace, and not using shortcuts as you suggest.
The
reason being that it can be very hard to search for usages of a
I'm trying to actually change some instances of :use to :require :refer :all,
as urged by several people here, and it's not as simple as I had hoped. Or I'm
missing something obvious.
If I have a simple little project containing a namespace declared as follows:
(ns use2require.core
(:use
2013/7/27 Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu:
I'm trying to actually change some instances of :use to :require :refer :all,
as urged by several people here, and it's not as simple as I had hoped. Or
I'm missing something obvious.
If I have a simple little project containing a namespace
On Jul 27, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
But it's really not much better. This too will explode the number of lines
in many of my ns declarations.
Is there indeed a reasonably concise way to do this? What is it?
Would it still bother you if the IDE helped maintain the ns
2013/7/27 Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu:
On Jul 27, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
But it's really not much better. This too will explode the number of lines
in many of my ns declarations.
Is there indeed a reasonably concise way to do this? What is it?
Would it still bother
BTW Lee, going back to your original question, I think the solution that
you came up with is the only one I can think of that does what you want. Of
course you can put it on one line:
(ns use2require.core
(:require [use2require [myfns :refer :all] [yourfns :refer :all]]))
But I agree it's more
Lee,
On our work projects at Runa, we have an unwritten code standard of always
writing out the full namespace, and not using shortcuts as you suggest.
The reason being that it can be very hard to search for usages of a
namespace if you don't fully qualify them, which makes refactoring a
On Jul 27, 2013, at 7:44 PM, Colin Fleming wrote:
BTW Lee, going back to your original question, I think the solution that you
came up with is the only one I can think of that does what you want. Of
course you can put it on one line:
(ns use2require.core
(:require [use2require [myfns
On Jul 27, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
Here's how I see it: it would change the ns declaration depending on
the choices you make in the code completion list. That is, the code
completion list would have to not only be made of what's already
loaded in the REPL (as is generally the
It's true that both Laurent's and my suggestions are complicated, but we're
thinking about it from an implementer's point of view. What I currently
have from a *user's* point of view for classes is great, you just don't
think about it. I don't know how much Java development you've done, but
this
On Jul 27, 2013, at 8:49 PM, Colin Fleming wrote:
It's true that both Laurent's and my suggestions are complicated, but we're
thinking about it from an implementer's point of view. What I currently have
from a *user's* point of view for classes is great, you just don't think
about it. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
