Re: partition-distinct

2012-03-30 Thread David Jagoe
On 29 March 2012 21:41, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:18 PM, David Jagoe davidja...@gmail.com wrote: Given a sequence like this: [1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2] partition it to get this: [(1 2) (1 2) (1) (1 2) (1 2) (2) (2)] ! (defn partition-distinct [s

Re: partition-distinct

2012-03-30 Thread Jay Fields
) (2) (2)] ! (defn partition-distinct [s] (lazy-seq (loop [seen #{} s (seq s) part []] (if s (let [[f r] s] (if (seen f) (cons (seq part) (partition-distinct s)) (recur (conj seen f) r (conj part f (if-let [part (seq part

Re: partition-distinct

2012-03-30 Thread Tassilo Horn
---start-8--- (defn partition-distinct [c] (reduce #(if (.contains (last %1) %2) (conj %1 [%2]) (conj (subvec %1 0 (dec (count %1))) (conj (last %1) %2))) [[]] (vec c))) --8---cut here---end

partition-distinct

2012-03-29 Thread David Jagoe
Hi all, I'm sure I'm missing a really simple way of doing this! Given a sequence like this: [1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2] partition it to get this: [(1 2) (1 2) (1) (1 2) (1 2) (2) (2)] I've been trying to write something generic like partition-by because the values are maps. Also I want to be able

Re: partition-distinct

2012-03-29 Thread Cedric Greevey
generic like partition-by because the values are maps. Also I want to be able to deal with more than 2 distinct values. Thanks! (defn partition-distinct [s] (lazy-seq (loop [seen #{} s (seq s) part []] (if s (let [[f r] s] (if (seen f) (cons (seq part

Re: partition-distinct

2012-03-29 Thread Weber, Martin S
Yeah I don't like that either. Consider (comp vals (partial group-by identity)). On 2012-03-29 16:18 , David Jagoe davidja...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm sure I'm missing a really simple way of doing this! Given a sequence like this: [1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2] partition it to get this: [(1 2) (1

Re: partition-distinct

2012-03-29 Thread Weber, Martin S
Meh. Half-assed (mis)reading. Sorry. -Martin On 2012-03-29 16:23 , Weber, Martin S martin.we...@nist.gov wrote: Yeah I don't like that either. Consider (comp vals (partial group-by identity)). On 2012-03-29 16:18 , David Jagoe davidja...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm sure I'm missing a really