range function wrong in 1.7.0-beta?

2015-04-18 Thread Mathias De Wachter
Hi,

this looks like quite a serious bug to me (at least it messed up my 
project):

First taking the code taken from grimoire:

clojurechess.position (defn range
  Returns a lazy seq of nums from start (inclusive) to end
  (exclusive), by step, where start defaults to 0, step to 1, and end to
  infinity. When step is equal to 0, returns an infinite sequence of
  start. When start is equal to end, returns empty list.
  {:added 1.0
   :static true}
  ([] (range 0 Double/POSITIVE_INFINITY 1))
  ([end] (range 0 end 1))
  ([start end] (range start end 1))
  ([start end step]
   (lazy-seq
(let [b (chunk-buffer 32)
  comp (cond (or (zero? step) (= start end)) not=
 (pos? step) 
 (neg? step) )]
  (loop [i start]
(if (and ( (count b) 32)
 (comp i end))
  (do
(chunk-append b i)
(recur (+ i step)))
  (chunk-cons (chunk b) 
  (when (comp i end) 
(range i end step)
WARNING: range already refers to: #'clojure.core/range in namespace: 
clojurechess.position, being replaced by: #'clojurechess.position/range
#'clojurechess.position/range
clojurechess.position (range 0 11 2)
(0 2 4 6 8 10)

which is what I'd expect and relied on.

Now, looking at the new code:

clojurechess.position (clojure.repl/source clojure.core/range)
(defn range
  Returns a lazy seq of nums from start (inclusive) to end
  (exclusive), by step, where start defaults to 0, step to 1, and end to
  infinity. When step is equal to 0, returns an infinite sequence of
  start. When start is equal to end, returns empty list.
  {:added 1.0
   :static true}
  ([]
   (iterate inc' 0))
  ([end]
   (if (instance? Long end)
 (clojure.lang.LongRange/create end)
 (clojure.lang.Range/create end)))
  ([start end]
   (if (and (instance? Long start) (instance? Long end))
 (clojure.lang.LongRange/create start end)
 (clojure.lang.Range/create start end)))
  ([start end step]
   (if (and (instance? Long start) (instance? Long end) (instance? Long 
step))
 (clojure.lang.LongRange/create start end step)
 (clojure.lang.Range/create start end step
nil
clojurechess.position (clojure.lang.Range/create 0 11 2)
(0 2 4 6 8 10)
clojurechess.position (clojure.lang.LongRange/create 0 11 2)
(0 2 4 6 8)
clojurechess.position (clojure.core/range 0 11 2)
(0 2 4 6 8)

So the culprit is clojure.lang.LongRange/create.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: range function wrong in 1.7.0-beta?

2015-04-18 Thread Beau Fabry
Ouch. Suspect this is the 
problem 
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/LongRange.java#L161

Pretty sure that boolean should be round the other way.

On Saturday, April 18, 2015 at 12:32:40 PM UTC-7, Mathias De Wachter wrote:

 Hi,

 this looks like quite a serious bug to me (at least it messed up my 
 project):

 First taking the code taken from grimoire:

 clojurechess.position (defn range
   Returns a lazy seq of nums from start (inclusive) to end
   (exclusive), by step, where start defaults to 0, step to 1, and end to
   infinity. When step is equal to 0, returns an infinite sequence of
   start. When start is equal to end, returns empty list.
   {:added 1.0
:static true}
   ([] (range 0 Double/POSITIVE_INFINITY 1))
   ([end] (range 0 end 1))
   ([start end] (range start end 1))
   ([start end step]
(lazy-seq
 (let [b (chunk-buffer 32)
   comp (cond (or (zero? step) (= start end)) not=
  (pos? step) 
  (neg? step) )]
   (loop [i start]
 (if (and ( (count b) 32)
  (comp i end))
   (do
 (chunk-append b i)
 (recur (+ i step)))
   (chunk-cons (chunk b) 
   (when (comp i end) 
 (range i end step)
 WARNING: range already refers to: #'clojure.core/range in namespace: 
 clojurechess.position, being replaced by: #'clojurechess.position/range
 #'clojurechess.position/range
 clojurechess.position (range 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8 10)

 which is what I'd expect and relied on.

 Now, looking at the new code:

 clojurechess.position (clojure.repl/source clojure.core/range)
 (defn range
   Returns a lazy seq of nums from start (inclusive) to end
   (exclusive), by step, where start defaults to 0, step to 1, and end to
   infinity. When step is equal to 0, returns an infinite sequence of
   start. When start is equal to end, returns empty list.
   {:added 1.0
:static true}
   ([]
(iterate inc' 0))
   ([end]
(if (instance? Long end)
  (clojure.lang.LongRange/create end)
  (clojure.lang.Range/create end)))
   ([start end]
(if (and (instance? Long start) (instance? Long end))
  (clojure.lang.LongRange/create start end)
  (clojure.lang.Range/create start end)))
   ([start end step]
(if (and (instance? Long start) (instance? Long end) (instance? Long 
 step))
  (clojure.lang.LongRange/create start end step)
  (clojure.lang.Range/create start end step
 nil
 clojurechess.position (clojure.lang.Range/create 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8 10)
 clojurechess.position (clojure.lang.LongRange/create 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8)
 clojurechess.position (clojure.core/range 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8)

 So the culprit is clojure.lang.LongRange/create.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: range function wrong in 1.7.0-beta?

2015-04-18 Thread Nelson Morris
Created http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1709 and
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1710 around the two issues.

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Beau Fabry imf...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ouch. Suspect this is the problem
 https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/LongRange.java#L161

 Pretty sure that boolean should be round the other way.


 On Saturday, April 18, 2015 at 12:32:40 PM UTC-7, Mathias De Wachter wrote:

 Hi,

 this looks like quite a serious bug to me (at least it messed up my
 project):

 First taking the code taken from grimoire:

 clojurechess.position (defn range
   Returns a lazy seq of nums from start (inclusive) to end
   (exclusive), by step, where start defaults to 0, step to 1, and end to
   infinity. When step is equal to 0, returns an infinite sequence of
   start. When start is equal to end, returns empty list.
   {:added 1.0
:static true}
   ([] (range 0 Double/POSITIVE_INFINITY 1))
   ([end] (range 0 end 1))
   ([start end] (range start end 1))
   ([start end step]
(lazy-seq
 (let [b (chunk-buffer 32)
   comp (cond (or (zero? step) (= start end)) not=
  (pos? step) 
  (neg? step) )]
   (loop [i start]
 (if (and ( (count b) 32)
  (comp i end))
   (do
 (chunk-append b i)
 (recur (+ i step)))
   (chunk-cons (chunk b)
   (when (comp i end)
 (range i end step)
 WARNING: range already refers to: #'clojure.core/range in namespace:
 clojurechess.position, being replaced by: #'clojurechess.position/range
 #'clojurechess.position/range
 clojurechess.position (range 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8 10)

 which is what I'd expect and relied on.

 Now, looking at the new code:

 clojurechess.position (clojure.repl/source clojure.core/range)
 (defn range
   Returns a lazy seq of nums from start (inclusive) to end
   (exclusive), by step, where start defaults to 0, step to 1, and end to
   infinity. When step is equal to 0, returns an infinite sequence of
   start. When start is equal to end, returns empty list.
   {:added 1.0
:static true}
   ([]
(iterate inc' 0))
   ([end]
(if (instance? Long end)
  (clojure.lang.LongRange/create end)
  (clojure.lang.Range/create end)))
   ([start end]
(if (and (instance? Long start) (instance? Long end))
  (clojure.lang.LongRange/create start end)
  (clojure.lang.Range/create start end)))
   ([start end step]
(if (and (instance? Long start) (instance? Long end) (instance? Long
 step))
  (clojure.lang.LongRange/create start end step)
  (clojure.lang.Range/create start end step
 nil
 clojurechess.position (clojure.lang.Range/create 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8 10)
 clojurechess.position (clojure.lang.LongRange/create 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8)
 clojurechess.position (clojure.core/range 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8)

 So the culprit is clojure.lang.LongRange/create.

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: range function wrong in 1.7.0-beta?

2015-04-18 Thread Nelson Morris
I was trying to write a test.check property for this, and it seems to have
a found a different bug around `count` and `range`.

```
*clojure-version*
;;= {:major 1, :minor 7, :incremental 0, :qualifier beta1}

(require '[clojure.test.check :as tc])
(require '[clojure.test.check.generators :as gen])
(require '[clojure.test.check.properties :as prop])

(def range-count-is-ceil-of-space-divided-by-step
  (prop/for-all [start gen/int
 end gen/int
 step (gen/such-that #( % 0)
 gen/nat)]
(= (count (range start end step))
   (long (Math/ceil (double (/ (max 0 (- end start))
step)))

(tc/quick-check 100 range-count-is-ceil-of-space-divided-by-step)
;;= {:result false, :seed 1429389499284, :failing-size 5, :num-tests 6,
:fail [-2 -1 3], :shrunk {:total-nodes-visited 9, :depth 3, :result false,
:smallest [-1 0 2]}}

(range -1 0 2)
;;= (-1)
(count (range -1 0 2))
;;= 0

(tc/quick-check 100 range-count-is-ceil-of-space-divided-by-step)
;;= {:result false, :seed 1429389621085, :failing-size 4, :num-tests 5,
:fail [-3 4 5], :shrunk {:total-nodes-visited 11, :depth 5, :result false,
:smallest [0 1 2]}}

(range 0 1 2)
;;= (0)
(count (range 0 1 2))
;;= 0
```

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Mathias De Wachter 
mathias.dewach...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 this looks like quite a serious bug to me (at least it messed up my
 project):

 First taking the code taken from grimoire:

 clojurechess.position (defn range
   Returns a lazy seq of nums from start (inclusive) to end
   (exclusive), by step, where start defaults to 0, step to 1, and end to
   infinity. When step is equal to 0, returns an infinite sequence of
   start. When start is equal to end, returns empty list.
   {:added 1.0
:static true}
   ([] (range 0 Double/POSITIVE_INFINITY 1))
   ([end] (range 0 end 1))
   ([start end] (range start end 1))
   ([start end step]
(lazy-seq
 (let [b (chunk-buffer 32)
   comp (cond (or (zero? step) (= start end)) not=
  (pos? step) 
  (neg? step) )]
   (loop [i start]
 (if (and ( (count b) 32)
  (comp i end))
   (do
 (chunk-append b i)
 (recur (+ i step)))
   (chunk-cons (chunk b)
   (when (comp i end)
 (range i end step)
 WARNING: range already refers to: #'clojure.core/range in namespace:
 clojurechess.position, being replaced by: #'clojurechess.position/range
 #'clojurechess.position/range
 clojurechess.position (range 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8 10)

 which is what I'd expect and relied on.

 Now, looking at the new code:

 clojurechess.position (clojure.repl/source clojure.core/range)
 (defn range
   Returns a lazy seq of nums from start (inclusive) to end
   (exclusive), by step, where start defaults to 0, step to 1, and end to
   infinity. When step is equal to 0, returns an infinite sequence of
   start. When start is equal to end, returns empty list.
   {:added 1.0
:static true}
   ([]
(iterate inc' 0))
   ([end]
(if (instance? Long end)
  (clojure.lang.LongRange/create end)
  (clojure.lang.Range/create end)))
   ([start end]
(if (and (instance? Long start) (instance? Long end))
  (clojure.lang.LongRange/create start end)
  (clojure.lang.Range/create start end)))
   ([start end step]
(if (and (instance? Long start) (instance? Long end) (instance? Long
 step))
  (clojure.lang.LongRange/create start end step)
  (clojure.lang.Range/create start end step
 nil
 clojurechess.position (clojure.lang.Range/create 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8 10)
 clojurechess.position (clojure.lang.LongRange/create 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8)
 clojurechess.position (clojure.core/range 0 11 2)
 (0 2 4 6 8)

 So the culprit is clojure.lang.LongRange/create.

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Clojure group.
 To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Clojure group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at

Re: range function wrong in 1.7.0-beta?

2015-04-18 Thread Alex Miller
Thanks all! Will definitely fix before release.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.