Hi all,
I have a sequence of {:key K :value V} maps. There is no guarantee that
there is one map for every known K. I need to ensure that there is a map
for each known K.
Imagine the sequence represents a distribution between 1 and 5. The
initial sequence might only be [{:key 3 :value 30}
Great stuff - thanks Jim. (not sure why my previous post got lost)
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:48:17 AM UTC, Jim foo.bar wrote:
On 19/11/13 11:42, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
On 19/11/13 11:29, Colin Yates wrote:
Imagine the sequence represents a distribution between 1 and 5
That's the culprit - I was wondering why nrepl wouldn't disappear!
For me, cider has been rock solid with midje-mode, but I am not really
exercising it too much.
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 2:56:05 PM UTC, Phillip Lord wrote:
I discovered one of the reasons for my issues with stability
Something that works is putting :injections [(require 'clojure.repl)] in
.lein/profiles.clj.
It works (as evidenced by (doc ...) working in lein repl) but I don't
know if that is the correct approach.
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 4:57:48 PM UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
total newbie here
this.
The ease of which data can be mangled and transformed was the primary
reason I chose Clojure over Java, Groovy and Scala.
That, and the fact the language is just so darn expressive.
On Thursday, November 14, 2013 8:56:59 AM UTC, Islon Scherer wrote:
For me it's about 1 thing: Data.
A
} {:key 5, :value
nil}]
-8-8-
Cheers,
Josh
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
On 19/11/13 11:29, Colin Yates wrote:
In Java I would do something like:
// create a convenient look up to avoid nasty N^2 lookups
MapObject
Hi Sean,
First - I hugely appreciate the work you have done and use java.jdbc daily.
However, as a complete newbie I found the included DSL very unhelpful. The
java.jdbc API is very wide and navigating it was hard, Particularly as it
was in a transition from using bound *db* to not, so
Perfect.
--- Original Message ---
From: Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com
Sent: 24 November 2013 05:26
To: clojure@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: java.jdbc DSLs (java.jdbc.sql / java.jdbc.ddl)
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Keith Irwin ke...@devtrope.com wrote:
Personally, the DSL doesn’t
For me (a similarly entrenched OO guy) I found it very challenging.
Nothing to do with the syntax, but you are moving from a world of locked up
bits of data behind a (hopefully) impenetrable API to a world full of
lightweight data with a myriad of tiny functions which pretty much all
perform
I have a sequence of file names and I want to make them unique. (uniquify
[a b c a]) = [a b c a_1])
This is what I have come up with, but surely there is a better way?
What would you all do? Feedback welcome (including the word 'muppet' as I
am sure I have missed something simple) :)
(defn
code is a good reference.
Thanks
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a sequence of file names and I want to make them unique. (uniquify [a
b c a]) = [a b c a_1])
This is what I have come up with, but surely there is a better way?
What would you all do
you've seen so far. You might also look at the
implementation of distinct in clojure.core which is similar (you want to
detect duplicates in the same way, but emit new names instead of omitting
dupes).
On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:59:10 AM UTC-6, Colin Yates wrote:
I have a sequence
Love it. Much more readable without any nasty persistent state.
On Friday, 10 January 2014 15:19:03 UTC, Ray Miller wrote:
On 10 January 2014 14:59, Colin Yates colin...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
I have a sequence of file names and I want to make them unique.
(uniquify [a b c a]) = [a b
on the uPhine, sorry
Le vendredi 10 janvier 2014, Colin Yates a écrit :
I have a sequence of file names and I want to make them unique.
(uniquify [a b c a]) = [a b c a_1])
This is what I have come up with, but surely there is a better way?
What would you all do? Feedback welcome (including
This and Jonas' are my current favourites, for what that's worth.
Keep the suggestions coming!
On Friday, 10 January 2014 17:29:20 UTC, Laurent PETIT wrote:
What about this one?
Inspired by Stefan's, with more destructuring in loop, format-fn as a
function, initial call to (seq) then
At the risk of self promotion*, have a read
of https://groups.google.com/d/msg/clojure/rt-l_X3gK-I/K80axT77XzwJ - it is
an excellent example of iterative compared to functional. You can see at
least 4 distinct approaches to solving a fairly straight forward problem.
It is a startlingly clear
way to take the wind out of our sails! Well spotted :).
On Friday, 10 January 2014 19:39:45 UTC, puzzler wrote:
Technically, all these solutions are flawed.
With the input
[a a a_1]
you'll get back
[a a_1 a_1]
To truly address this, you need to also add the newly formatted filename
until it is unique, but I haven't
got that far yet (without potentially blowing the stack!)
Then I saw your 'recur' used outside of a loop which points the way...
Thanks!
On Friday, 10 January 2014 20:16:28 UTC, puzzler wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Colin Yates colin
))]))
[[] {}]
items))
(fact strings can be made unique
(s/uniquify [a b c]) = [a b c]
(s/uniquify [a b a c b b b b a]) = [a b a_1 c
b_1 b_2 b_3 b_4 a_2])
On Friday, 10 January 2014 20:59:00 UTC, Colin Yates wrote:
Sorry - wrong c/p:
(first (reduce
Hi all,
Any one broken that ground before?
Thanks,
Col
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
Point, but I don't know to what
extent.
Ragnar
On Wednesday, 15 January 2014 09:08:09 UTC, Colin Yates wrote:
Hi all,
Any one broken that ground before?
Thanks,
Col
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post
I think the right (or maybe idiomatic is a better word) organisation is
an effect of a very important cause - changing the way you think about a
software system. Simplistically, OO promises to be a world full of chunks
of knowledge and behaviour that politely ask other chunks to behave in a
I don't know.
But maybe the lack of coverage tools is itself interesting? My (not quite
formed/making this up as I go) view is that maybe coverage tools are there
to address the implicit complexity in other mainstream languages and/or to
help mitigate the risk of the potentially large and
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 03:19:05AM -0800, Colin Yates wrote:
I don't know.
But maybe the lack of coverage tools is itself interesting? My (not
quite
formed/making this up as I go) view is that maybe coverage tools are
there
to address the implicit complexity in other mainstream
Is there going to be online access during/after the event? I would greatly
value seeing this, but probably not enough to travel from the UK to Chicago
:).
On Tuesday, 4 February 2014 12:06:06 UTC, Jay Fields wrote:
tl; dr: I'm presenting Lessons Learned from Adopting Clojure in
Chicago on
if there are any
logical errors in your code which cause the branches to not be hit.
Aaron
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 03:19:05AM -0800, Colin Yates wrote:
I don't know.
But maybe the lack of coverage tools is itself interesting? My (not
quite
formed/making this up as I go) view is that maybe
04, 2014 at 04:18:30AM -0800, Colin Yates wrote:
Comments in line.
On Tuesday, 4 February 2014 11:23:36 UTC, Aaron France wrote:
I don't want to seem rude but I think you've drank a bit too much
kool-aid.
You know the phrase I don't want to seem rude doesn't actually do
programming's panacea?
Aaron
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 06:12:18AM -0800, Colin Yates wrote:
This has turned into an unconstructive argument and for whatever reason
we
don't seem to be communicating clearly. Shame as I (and probably most
people on here) only want to help. You seem
automatically somehow
gives you insight into the coverage of your tests. Which it does not.
You still maintain this.
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 06:28:51AM -0800, Colin Yates wrote:
I have no idea why you aren't gushing. I'm not gushing, and haven't
gushed
about anything technical for years
This looks excellent! Desperately trying to suppress the whole emacs/vi
battle raging inside which has is now rising up again :).
On Sunday, 2 February 2014 13:44:12 UTC, Oleh wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently added some Clojure support to
https://github.com/abo-abo/lispy.
A short description
my thoughts
on TDD.
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 7:24:21 AM UTC-5, Rafael Peixoto de Azevedo
wrote:
+1 from Melbourne :)
I actually gave the talk in Melbourne, as part of YOW!. It was recorded
and will be online at some point.
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 7:22:06 AM UTC-5, Colin Yates
Without starting a flame war - how are you finding LightTable for
production? Moving away from emacs and paredit would be quite hard and
every time I look at LightTable I get really excited until I actually
download and try it... That is almost certainly because I don't have the
time to
Interesting - thanks all.
My experience of Light Table is quite close to Norman's, although I
discounted that *in my case* to not spending enough time with it. Knowing
a little about who Sean is (from following your blog/comments/clojure.jdbc,
not stalking! :)) I put a lot of weight behind
Did I see a thread a while ago where doing this caught some people out
because it wiped out some other performance switches? I can't find the
thread.
Apologies if I am spreading FUD
On Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:05:18 UTC, Alex Miller wrote:
To override the default tiered
To be honest I prefer the first although I get your point about the over
simplification.
If I were going anywhere with this it would be to generalise it into a
provided processor, something like:
(- :processor map
things
wrangle
...
)
but I am not sure the cognitive load of the extra
Depends who is doing the expecting as to whether that behaviour is correct.
Formal logicians, mathematicians, computer scientists etc. would respond
sure, it is vacously true. For almost everybody else it feels wrong
but is then true when you think about it a bit.
I would suggest the
I upgraded my emacs and clojure-fill-docstring seems to have disappeared.
clojure-mode is still there and activated but no clojure-fill-docstring.
Before I spend time hunting through changelogs has anybody else noticed?
Is this expected?
--
You received this message because you are
Hi Bastian, sucks being sick. You mention it was unnecessary - can you let
me know the thing that made it redundant? I tried fill-paragraph but that
doesn't quite work...
On Tuesday, 8 April 2014 20:28:52 UTC+1, Bastien Guerry wrote:
Hi Colin,
Colin Yates colin...@gmail.com javascript
:33 +0200
Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Bastian, sucks being sick. You mention it was unnecessary - can
you let me know the thing that made it redundant?
It was less redundant than weird.
I tried fill-paragraph but that doesn't quite work...
Can you explicit what
Hello back!
We are using Clojure on the JVM as the implementation language for a
platform that will underpin our applications for the next decade. It is
relatively new and so far we have implemented the analysis module which is
essentially a generic charting engine.
So far we have 5547
09:14:38 UTC+1, Colin Yates wrote:
Hello back!
We are using Clojure on the JVM as the implementation language for a
platform that will underpin our applications for the next decade. It is
relatively new and so far we have implemented the analysis module which is
essentially a generic
Hi Fergal,
Thanks for those links. I started using protocols and defrecords but I
(maybe mistakenly) got the impression that they were frowned upon. As it
turns out, maps (typically with a :type key) and multi methods go a long
long way, but I still end up with fairly deep nesting of maps.
) at the
moment, it's just wonderful.
[1] https://github.com/zcaudate/adi
Regards,
Fergal Byrne
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Colin Yates colin...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Hi Fergal,
Thanks for those links. I started using protocols and defrecords but I
(maybe mistakenly
As others have said - a more focused question would help.
Our back end runs on ring + compojure using https://github.com/jkk/honeysql
for querying and straight https://github.com/clojure/java.jdbc for writes.
We use https://github.com/marick/Midje/wiki rather than clojure.test
and
you hives.
On 11 April 2014 20:17, Colin Yates colin...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
As others have said - a more focused question would help.
Our back end runs on ring + compojure using
https://github.com/jkk/honeysql for querying and straight
https://github.com/clojure/java.jdbc
Multimethods are fantastic and do indeed work across namespaces if by
across namespaces you mean you can defmethod in ns2 a defmulti in ns1.
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 2:56:30 AM UTC+1, Andrew Chambers wrote:
An update, I read about protocols and multimethods. I think multimethods
are a
My 2p - I interpret the contract as being boolean. Truthy values are
'polymorphically' equivalent*1 so sure. The concern would be people
relying on the implementation and treating the values as none-truthy (i.e.
in your example relying on the fact it is a string being returned, so (=
(This has been discussed before but as this is fairly subjective I am
interested in whether people's opinion has changed)
What are people's experiences around using keywords or defined accessors
for navigating data structures in Clojure (assuming the use of maps)? Do
people prefer using raw
:foo to foo. For navigating nested maps, get-in, update-in and assoc-in
with keywords seem natural and practical to me.
On 22 April 2014 10:43, Colin Yates colin...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
(This has been discussed before but as this is fairly subjective I am
interested in whether people's
Nice.
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:36:06 AM UTC+1, Jim foo.bar wrote:
there is really no reason to use `get-in` with keywords/symbols as they
know how to look themselves up...in other words, you don't need to pay
for any polymorphic calls :
(get-in [:a :b :c :d] someMap) = (- someMap :a
So a few months after using emacs, I gotta say I love it. First I
absolutely hated it with a passion, and it really highlights my (fast but)
poor typing skills :). Like Clojure I guess it requires a very different
mindset. My constant frustration now is deciding whether to spend the time
Without static typing, I guess grep is the best?
On 1 May 2013 12:13, Ulises ulises.cerv...@gmail.com wrote:
The biggest 'ah - got it' for me was when I realised IDEs are great for
navigating huge object models which are relatively narrow but deep (i.e.
lots of nested relationships). This
(newbie, but trying hard!)
I am designing a Woobly. A Woobly is non-trivial and has a number of
internal data structures (queues, worker threads etc.). You can 'add' and
'remove' jobs from a Woobly.
In OO land I might have a Woobly interface with the various methods which
provides a public
a bunch - really helpful.
On 9 May 2013 17:30, James Reeves ja...@booleanknot.com wrote:
On 9 May 2013 17:07, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
The part I am struggling with is how to create a Woobly without exposing
its internals.
To what end? What's the benefit?
If you take a look
hairs, I genuinely want to
improve my Clojure intuition.
On 9 May 2013 21:05, James Reeves ja...@booleanknot.com wrote:
On 9 May 2013 18:03, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
I am nervous as well about expose internals but trust people to do the
right thing because in this case, if I
external users of (woobly/create-woobly) can in theory dig into the
internals of the woobly object, but it should be relatively obvious that
this isn't a good idea.
I'd defer making protocols until you actually need polymorphism.
- Korny
On 10 May 2013 03:03, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com
(newbie, getting better each day!)
I assume we all know DI. Through the use of a central registry I can
register a service (a bean in a Spring bean factory for example). I also
define consumers of that service in the same registry passing in the
configured *instance* of that service.
In
AM, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Korny.
Ok, the over-ridding theme seems to be: expose state, even if it is
dangerous, but expect consumers to 'do the right thing' and read the
documentation.
I can see that. I guess I have worked (and to be honest, been guilty
myself
On 10 May 2013 14:10, James Reeves ja...@booleanknot.com wrote:
Have you tried it? :)
I've authored about 40 Clojure libraries over 5 years, some with data
structures with internal components. The number of times someone has said
I did X to this internal data and it broke is exactly zero.
Thanks both - some good suggestions. After years of Java I am loving how
'symmetrical' everything is in Clojure (I guess in Lisp). Thanks for the
library references.
On 10 May 2013 14:14, Ben Mabey b...@benmabey.com wrote:
Hi Colin,
On 5/10/13 5:04 AM, Colin Yates wrote:
1) to use
14:20, Colin Yates wrote:
This is all about changing my mindset from 15-odd years of Java dev by
learning from others, so let's give it a go. Years of enterprise Java dev
have gotten their cynical, 'data is precious and should be hidden away',
'other devs will do the wrong thing' etc. claws
Thanks Timo; Interesting links. Loving Clojure, but boy is it challenging
the stuff I have been doing for the past how-ever many years :).
On 10 May 2013 20:14, Timo Mihaljov t...@mihaljov.info wrote:
On 10.05.2013 14:04, Colin Yates wrote:
2) to provide a 'get-ds' accessor which returns
dependencies. You can easily add whatever dependencies you
need. You don't have to think about it, you can work around problems
that crop up.
Does that help Colin?
Sean
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com
wrote:
(newbie, getting better each day!)
I assume we
Not specifically, nope.
On 11 May 2013 10:37, Jimmy jimmy.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Do any of the clojure books cover this topic?
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note
Hi all,
I have a scheduler which creates a future that basically does a (while true
(let [next-job (.take queue)]...)), where queue is a LinkedBlockingQueue.
The problem is that once it is running, because futures aren't daemon
threads it hangs lein. It will ultimately run inside a compojure
,
Jason
On Friday, May 10, 2013 4:04:20 AM UTC-7, Colin Yates wrote:
(newbie, getting better each day!)
I assume we all know DI. Through the use of a central registry I can
register a service (a bean in a Spring bean factory for example). I also
define consumers of that service in the same
/author/Stuart-Sierra
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 10:48:02 AM UTC+2, Colin Yates wrote:
Yes it does, thanks. It is amazing how much you can do in the typical
spring/hibernate stack with a decent IDE without engaging your brain :).
Clojure involves far less ceremony and really does expose
Thanks both, good suggestions.
On 15 May 2013 23:38, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
Colin Yates wrote:
I have a scheduler which creates a future that basically
does a (while true (let [next-job (.take queue)]...)),
where queue is a LinkedBlockingQueue. The problem
Hi all,
If the function executed in a future throws an error it is printed out in
the repl immediately. If that function is executed in a future which
itself is executed in a future then it isn't.
For example, imagine somebody wrote the following code (please, suspend
belief and just accept
Hi,
I am trying to get clojure-test-mode working in emacs
from https://github.com/technomancy/clojure-mode.
I have the nrepl working great, the problem is if I C-c, C-, in a test file
then I get the
clojure.lang.Compiler$CompilerException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
clojure.test.mode,
https://github.com/technomancy/clojure-mode/issues/146#issuecomment-15447065
provides one solution - navigate to the source code and then start nrepl.
On Tuesday, 21 May 2013 11:37:19 UTC+1, Colin Yates wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get clojure-test-mode working in emacs from
https
Howdy,
I am using clojure.test and have some questions of how to write idiomatic
Clojure. This really isn't about testing at all per-se.
First - I know about fixtures to get (at least) the same as JUnit's
before/after behaviour.
My code is a bloomy. You can configure the bloomy and it does
://thornydev.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/before-and-after-logic-in-clojuretest.html
U
On 21 May 2013 15:17, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
I am using clojure.test and have some questions of how to write idiomatic
Clojure. This really isn't about testing at all per-se.
First - I
at 10:05 AM, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Ulises,
I don't think I am as that would require essentially a fixture per
distinct combinations of test state, which is almost the same number of
tests.
Have I missed something?
On 21 May 2013 15:51, Ulises ulises.cerv...@gmail.com
No worries ;)
On 21 May 2013 17:18, Ulises ulises.cerv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Colin,
Apologies, I missed your First - I know about fixtures... line :)
I'd probably +1 Gaz's macro (I've not tested it either but it looks
reasonable.)
On 21 May 2013 16:05, Colin Yates colin.ya
Can you not use
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.html?
That will provide the blocking element.
To execute N (i.e. 10 in your example) use a
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.html.
The 'glue'
Nice.
On 30 May 2013 12:57, John D. Hume duelin.mark...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 30, 2013 4:12 AM, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
; the following would need to reify itself to be a Runnable, not got
that far yet :)
(defn execute [job result-queue] (let [result (job)] (.put result
I think we need to be careful here about the association between Java
and Clojure. Sure, they run on the JVM, but that is their *only*
relationship (from a consumer's point of view) as far as I can see.
For me, after a decade+ of developing Enterprise Java (primarily web)
applications I am sick
If it weren't for McDonalds I wouldn't have such a large belly, but my
belly isn't McDonalds ;) I jest (obviously!), but I do think this is
a fundamental point. I (like a lot of others I expect) found Clojure
and Scala whilst looking for Java.next. I read a bit about Scala, and
part of its
*This isn't meant to start a flame-war!*
I am pretty convinced that I want to use Clojure as my primary tool
(in place of Java/Groovy Spring and Hibernate) in writing Enterprise
applications on the JVM. By Enterprise I mean that my solution has to
be very stable, maintainable by others, subject
for even suggesting to
use Clojure as an enterprise greenfield. Industry and academia is
moving towards advanced type systems. Nobody in industry seriously
considers Clojure for enterprise systems.
On Jul 8, 12:43 pm, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
*This isn't meant to start
.
On Jul 8, 12:43 pm, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
*This isn't meant to start a flame-war!*
I am pretty convinced that I want to use Clojure as my primary tool
(in place of Java/Groovy Spring and Hibernate) in writing Enterprise
applications on the JVM. By Enterprise I mean that my
-weight tools and fly! OK - that's
enough.
Or, it might all be a catastrophic failure and I will be signing up to
Careers 2.0 :)
Col
P.S Usual disclaimer - still only written three lines of Clojure :)
On 8 July 2011 20:57, James Keats james.w.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 16, 3:08 pm, Colin
, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
I did think about moving this logic to the database, but I am toying
around
with a different model - having the entire data set in memory (possibly
across multiple nodes using messaging infrastructure to communicate).
The
reason
Nice link - many thanks
On 9 July 2011 17:27, Benny Tsai benny.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Colin,
Sorry, a bit late to the party here, but it might be worth taking a look
at Jeffrey Straszheim's c.c.graph library to see one way of modeling DAG's
and implementing various graph operations (such
I think he was being sarcy :)
On 9 July 2011 22:03, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Shree Mulay shreemu...@gmail.com wrote:
Clojure REALLY isn't ready for Enterprise level development.
That's your opinion but I expect there are enterprise
But then how would all the consultants make their money? ;)
Sent from my iPad
On 10 Jul 2011, at 04:56, Luc Prefontaine lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca wrote:
Hey, if it does not take a year and an army of nuclear scientists to
implement, it would already
be better :
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011
What other new shiny languages are there with any traction? Scala, and
maybe F#?
new and traction are pretty subjective. Sometimes (as in my case) the
searcher just needs enough to sell themselves on the tool they have already
chosen, i.e. just enough facts to fit my theory.
FWIW, I like
That sounds more like Enterprise Java Development to me :)
On 12 July 2011 13:20, Adam Burry abu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 12, 7:58 am, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, I like clojure.org the way it is. Without sounding like a
complete
muppet, I think of Clojure as a set
Besides the languages itself, the outsider wants to evaluate libraries,
community, platforms, support, etc.
That could be much more challenging than comparing a few bare languages.
Absolutely! I asked a couple of times for recommendations, and was quite
surprised at the lack of forthcoming
I find his videos very easy to watch - I think it was around a hour, but the
time flies by.
On 19 July 2011 14:16, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Adam Richardson simples...@gmail.com
wrote:
Watch the video and you'll see the comment Tim is referencing.
Quite - you don't get the ants in your pants vibe from plain text :)
On 19 July 2011 15:18, Ben Smith-Mannschott bsmith.o...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 16:11, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com
wrote:
I
Absolutely nothing to add to the argument as such except to say that I am
quite surprised at the level of resistance to James' thread. I can see the
argument if this was the 'dev' mailing list.
I have been reading this mailing list for a long while now (even if I
haven't contributed much to it)
+1 - I think an etiquette document needs to be written.
On 25 July 2011 15:10, Steve stephen.a.lind...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 25, 7:54 pm, James Keats james.w.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Best regards; love you, man, and sorry again for any misunderstanding
or unintended miscommunication.
The irony of +1 doesn't escape me, but +1
Sent from my iPad
On 26 Jul 2011, at 20:15, Base basselh...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Jul 26, 12:31 pm, Devin Walters dev...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's stop feeding this thread and turn our attention toward healthy and
productive discussion. This is my
Hi all,
Not sure whether this is good etiquette or not, but I wanted to praise
http://oreilly.com/catalog/0636920021667. I found it pretty useful in
bridging the gap between OO and FP. It isn't Clojure specific, but as a
(well established) Java/OO guy, this helped me get FP.
(not connected in
asking you to convince me to let this book jump the
queue. :^)
On Jul 29, 5:03 am, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Not sure whether this is good etiquette or not, but I wanted to
praisehttp://oreilly.com/catalog/0636920021667. I found it pretty useful in
bridging the gap
+1 as well. Surely (start-date voyage) would be more explicit than
(start voyage) though meaning there is no ambiguity for me; I would
(incorrectly) assume (start voyage) was a mutator :)
On 3 August 2011 18:22, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Brian
That assumption needs checking - first rule of performance analysis: check,
don't guess :)
For example, is the java code using an existing connection versus clojure
creating one? I would also time the cost of creating 10 clojure maps of
a similar structure. Finally - 100,000 is big enough
The point is that sequentially the GC gets to remove stale entries so
simplistically only 3000 records are in memory at any one time, in
parallel processing all 9 can be in memory at the same time.
Sent from my iPad
On 6 Aug 2011, at 21:34, Shoeb Bhinderwala shoeb.bhinderw...@gmail.com
1 - 100 of 551 matches
Mail list logo
