On Saturday, October 25, 2014 2:46:20 PM UTC-7, Marcus Lewis wrote:
> So... I've been using Clojure wrong, because I primarily use ClojureScript.
>
> Clojure
> my.clj.ns=> (def foo 1)
> #'my.clj.ns/foo
> my.clj.ns=> (set! foo 2)
> IllegalStateException Can't change/establish root binding of: foo w
So... I've been using Clojure wrong, because I primarily use ClojureScript.
> *Clojure*my.clj.ns=> (def foo 1)
> #'my.clj.ns/foo
> my.clj.ns=> (set! foo 2)
> IllegalStateException Can't change/establish root binding of: foo with set
> clojure.lang.Var.set (Var.java:221)
>
>
> *ClojureScript*my
Disclaimer: I've worked on CircleCI's frontend, but only since recently. I did
not have a hand in it's original design. Overall, I'm pretty happy with it and
Om, but I'd definitely change many things if I could. That's pretty standard
high-praise for any software project, as far as I'm concerned
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Mike Haney wrote:
> > Reagent is more than just a thin veneer over React. It does quite a bit
> of work, just as Om does. This is subjective, but Reagent feels more easy
> than simple to me. Sometimes, that’s what you want; sometimes it’s not.
> But: I’ve barely
It's largely unmaintained at this point - it's just thin sugar anyhow.
On Friday, October 24, 2014, Michiel Borkent
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering about the state of clojure.browser.{dom, ...}. Is this
> what people use from day to day when not working on a React based site?
> What else, do
Hi Gary, now you have mentioned it :), can you explain what you really like
about it?
On 25 Oct 2014 09:12, "Gary Verhaegen" wrote:
> I really like quiescent. I don't know why it's almost never mentioned in
> these discussions.
>
> On Saturday, 25 October 2014, Matt Ho wrote:
>
>> We ended up wi
I really like quiescent. I don't know why it's almost never mentioned in
these discussions.
On Saturday, 25 October 2014, Matt Ho wrote:
> We ended up with a similar path with other folks that posted. We started
> with Om, but found it brought with it a lot of incidental complexity.
> Switching
Hi all,
I've released an alpha quality Clojurescript port of Mark Engelberg's
fantastic parsing library, Instaparse
(https://github.com/Engelberg/instaparse). The Clojure code is still
retained in this project, so it is still Clojure compatible. Once
battle tested, the aim is to merge this upstrea
