Re: [ClojureScript] Foolproof Emacs + Browser Repl instructions?

2014-05-27 Thread Joel Holdbrooks
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 3:41:31 PM UTC-7, Daniel Kersten wrote: I've personally found weasel to be slightly faster to eval code with and also less brittle overall. It was also slightly easier to set up than austin. Basically, while my experience with austin was alright, my weasel experience

[ClojureScript] Foolproof Emacs + Browser Repl instructions?

2014-05-20 Thread Jamie Orchard-Hays
If anyone can point me at some, I'll be most obliged. Too much ditzing around with stuff that doesn't quite get me there the past couple hours. Cheers, Jamie -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you

Re: [ClojureScript] Foolproof Emacs + Browser Repl instructions?

2014-05-20 Thread Gary Trakhman
You likely hit one of the incompatibilities. It requires Austin 0.1.5-SNAPSHOT, CLJS 2202 or higher, and cider-nrepl 0.7.0--SNAPSHOT. ac-nrepl is no longer supported company-mode works, but there's some hokiness to it, so I'm not using it now. Sorry, I haven't gotten a chance to write

Re: [ClojureScript] Foolproof Emacs + Browser Repl instructions?

2014-05-20 Thread Achint Sandhu
Hi, I've had great luck with Weasel and have created a lein template that creates projects with the proper stuff. You can find it at: https://github.com/sandhu/om-weasel Hope it helps. Feedback welcome. If you'd prefer to use an austin based repl, I'd highly

Re: [ClojureScript] Foolproof Emacs + Browser Repl instructions?

2014-05-20 Thread Daniel Kersten
I've personally found weasel to be slightly faster to eval code with and also less brittle overall. It was also slightly easier to set up than austin. Basically, while my experience with austin was alright, my weasel experience has been great. (in the sense that I forget its there - because its