Looks great!
/dan
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 7:50:24 AM UTC+1, Jonas Enlund wrote:
Hi
As an exercise I ported the Om tutorial to Reagent. It's available at
https://github.com/jonase/reagent-tutorial
I hope you find it interesting.
Jonas
--
Note that posts from new members are
Hi all,
yesterday Laurent Petit asked me how to run on CCW OM and Austin together to
have the same live experience obtained by David Nolen in his OM tutorial.
This morning I created this simple om-start lein-template (a kind of cljs-start
without unit testing stuff) which allows to create a OM
I think Compojure delivers a lot of value, especially when coupled with
Clojure unique language features and interactive development style.
I'm not aware of any large apps in production that were written in Om,
however I designed Om with applications of every scale in mind.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014
I get more productivity out of the other incidental (by design) 'features'
or side-benefits of clojure than just macros, which is what Paul is talking
about.
Like... immutable data means I never have to worry about a class of things
going wrong, which speeds debugging.
I like what Paul's saying,
Thanks Laurent!
Has been a pleasure to interact with you!
mimmo
On Jan 25, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot Mimmo, you're invaluable in helping people cross bridges between
tools, libraries, and a real bright light for newcomers also !
Le
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 5:38:14 PM UTC+2, David Nolen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Jonas Enlund jonas@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 9:49:56 AM UTC+2, David Nolen wrote:
Nice. I do consider the non-modularity of `update-contacts!` here to be one
I've been all-in on clojure for about 6 months now, spending every free
moment learning and working in it. Paul Graham's writings played a big part in
my choice to invest in a lisp, so this is an interesting question.
After some reflection, I can say yes, clojure has had a substantial impact
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Jonas Enlund jonas.enl...@gmail.comwrote:
Interesting! I can definitely see how UI components directly manipulating
global state can make reuse difficult.
I guess this is not really an issue in React as their components have
local state (via
Thanks David,
it could be even better if someone explains to me how to make austin to run in
a browser connected REPL with `:none` optimization ;-)
mimmo
On Jan 25, 2014, at 6:37 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
This is great, thank you!
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:34 AM,
Knock, Knock, Chas, are you there?
:-)
mimmo
On Jan 25, 2014, at 7:01 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like one for Chas :)
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Mimmo Cosenza mimmo.cose...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks David,
it could be even better if someone explains to
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Dan Holmsand holms...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, that depends on your definition of modular, doesn't it :)
If I can't include somebody's component and apply time management to it,
that's sounds unambiguously non-modular with respect to *time management*.
It is
I was following along with this and hit an interesting bug
The contact list delete button actually works out of the gate in the first
example, (when its supposed to fail) and when I add the deref in the next step
I get
Uncaught Error: No protocol method IDeref.-deref defined for type
I just now tried `lien new mies-om foo` which created a project that uses
0.3.0.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:59 PM, David Pidcock eraz0rh...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahh whoops. Forgot the clean step.
The lein new project imported 0.2.3 for me. I assume that has been fixed
then?
--
Note that posts
On 25 jan 2014, at 20:50, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Dan Holmsand holms...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, that depends on your definition of modular, doesn't it :)
If I can't include somebody's component and apply time management to it,
that's sounds
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Dan Holmsand holms...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 jan 2014, at 20:50, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Dan Holmsand holms...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, that depends on your definition of modular, doesn't it :)
If I can't
Hey all,
I'm trying to build my clojure/clojurescript skill by porting this Facebook
React code into Om:
http://facebook.github.io/react/blog/2013/11/05/thinking-in-react.html
I trying to manipulate the products data structure functionally, instead of
sequentially.
(def products
Running this in the Rhino REPL I don't see this, what REPL are you using?
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Patrick Rodriguez pat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'm trying to build my clojure/clojurescript skill by porting this
Facebook React code into Om:
This tutorial was exactly what I needed, and hope to see more in the tutorial
as hinted at at the end.
I think I'm having a Light Table issue though. There is quite a few places
where you mention to try evaluating the functions. However, I think something
is messed up with my LightTable
I'm using Light Table 0.6.2
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 6:08:33 PM UTC-8, David Nolen wrote:
Running this in the Rhino REPL I don't see this, what REPL are you using?
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Patrick Rodriguez pat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'm trying to build my
Nothing wrong here. Light Table shows the result from the browser, that's
the source of the function you just evaluated. It's a quirk of
ClojureScript that's existed for some time - we might show something else
in the future.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Joel j...@harpsoft.com wrote:
This
20 matches
Mail list logo
