OK I've filed this here:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/ASYNC-79
In trying to create a minimal test case I tried a trivial macro
(defmacro my-case [expr cases] `(case ~expr ~@cases))
inside a go block, and that worked fine, so it's more subtle than just case in
a macro is broken.
I
Yeah, I was thinking that too. Certainly the simplest is just to go oh,
html changed, so touch all cljs files. It may even be enough to touch only
cljs files containing devcards - it would miss kioo components in other
files, but it would still be a lot better than it currently is.
On 22 July
Honestly, I'm against having core.async as anything other than a normal
macro. The less built-in magic the better, plus its nice to know that
almost everything I use, I could in theory build myself without hacking the
language itself, should I ever want to. The more features that get special
*I meant to write clean architecture :-)
On 23 July 2014 15:29, Daniel Kersten dkers...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly, I'm against having core.async as anything other than a normal
macro. The less built-in magic the better, plus its nice to know that
almost everything I use, I could in theory
Hello,
Is there any good way to send large immutable data with a lot of structural
sharing (like, app state with undo/redo stack) to the server,
and also get it from the server and correctly rebuild it in browser's memory?
If I just do (clj-js my-data), I will get a JSON, but it will lose the
We've been exploring lots of different options for this as well. Not quite
ready to share it yet, but there's no out-of-the-box solution to do this
efficiently yet it seems.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Anton Astashov anton.astas...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Is there any good way to send
Sounds like a tree diff algorithm to me.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5894879/detect-differences-between-tree-structures
On Thursday, July 24, 2014 5:47:54 AM UTC+12, Anton Astashov wrote:
Hello,
Is there any good way to send large immutable data with a lot of structural
sharing
On Thursday, July 24, 2014 10:07:56 AM UTC+8, Andrew Stoeckley wrote:
I'm looking for advice on where to start looking for the cause of a
clojurescript app racking up a whopping 2.5 GB of memory usage according to
the Chrome Task Manager.
I just found this:
Hi Anton,
In the Coils framework it does actually share structures (atoms) from the
client to the server, which can then be replayed back to the client again. An
example is at:
http://connecttous.co/
:where you can play around with the sample application, and then you can go to:
