I just ported an app with significant CLJX usage (55 files) to reader
conditionals and it works perfectly!
It looks like there is a small issue related to map literal containing
comments but I am not sure if it has been reported yet.
Julien
Le jeudi 21 mai 2015 13:31:16 UTC-3, Alex Miller a
No, please report if so.
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 8:39:32 PM UTC-5, Julien wrote:
I just ported an app with significant CLJX usage (55 files) to reader
conditionals and it works perfectly!
It looks like there is a small issue related to map literal containing
comments but I am not sure
Hi David,Then the name should be more like om/cached-value or om/init-value. It's very misleading as om/value. And I suggest there should be a name for getting the current value as having to do (get-in @(om/state
In what way is it broken? Both before and after wrapped a mutable iterator into
a caching seq. The new one is different in that it chunks so reads 32 at a time
instead of 1. However combining either with other chunking sequence operations
would have the same effect which is to say that using
Currently, this is at the very top of HN news
http://jsblocks.com
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Khalid Jebbari khalid.jebb...@gmail.com
wrote:
The following book isn't our yet, but it's written by a real javascript
expert. Pretty sure we will find inspiration to do isomorphic CLJS apps.
