Reminder + topics for Wednesday's (12/04/2013) cloud WG meeting

2013-12-04 Thread Sam Kottler
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the cloud WG meeting Wednesday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. The agenda is looking fairly light so if anyone has things they've been waiting to bring up, it's probably a good day for that. I won't be able to make

Re: Reminder + topics for Wednesday's (12/04/2013) cloud WG meeting

2013-12-04 Thread Matthias Runge
On 12/04/2013 10:27 AM, Sam Kottler wrote: Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the cloud WG meeting Wednesday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. The agenda is looking fairly light so if anyone has things they've been waiting to bring up, it's

Re: Fedora 20 TC4 AMIs

2013-12-04 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org writes: On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:42:44PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: The only issue compared to TC3 is one more file with wrong selinux context (/var/log/cron). So, for TC4: # restorecon -R -v -n -e /proc -e /sys -e /dev -e/run -e/tmp /

blurb for web site

2013-12-04 Thread Matthew Miller
The web team asked me to come up with a blurb for a slide on http://fedoraproject.org/. Something like: Cloud Computing with Fedora Fedora's guest image makes the perfect foundation for your fast-moving cloud project. Available in EC and other public cloud providers, and for download in

Re: we have nightly qcow builds now!

2013-12-04 Thread Nux!
On 03.12.2013 20:21, Matthew Miller wrote: Thanks to Fedora Infrastructure and Rel-Eng, we've got this: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=allview=treemethod=applianceorder=-id It's not the prettiest list, but once we have fedmsg for scratch builds

Re: blurb for web site

2013-12-04 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 12/04/2013 08:55 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: The web team asked me to come up with a blurb for a slide on http://fedoraproject.org/. Something like: Cloud Computing with Fedora Fedora's guest image makes the perfect foundation for your fast-moving cloud project. Available in EC

Re: we have nightly qcow builds now!

2013-12-04 Thread Nux!
On 04.12.2013 15:36, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: On 03.12.2013 20:21, Matthew Miller wrote: Thanks to Fedora Infrastructure and Rel-Eng, we've got this: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=allview=treemethod=applianceorder=-id

Re: we have nightly qcow builds now!

2013-12-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 04:28:06PM +, Nux! wrote: appliance-creator run from within koji. Cheers for the tip, I was not aware of this application. It's actually what Boxgrinder runs under the hood. In the future, we will be migrating to an Oz/ImageFactory-based approach, also integrated

Relationship with Fedora Server Workgroup

2013-12-04 Thread Joe Brockmeier
Since we deferred this to the mailing list during the meeting, I'm starting the thread here on the list... So... let's discuss. :-) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

Re: blurb for web site

2013-12-04 Thread Steven Dake
On 12/04/2013 07:55 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: The web team asked me to come up with a blurb for a slide on http://fedoraproject.org/. Something like: Cloud Computing with Fedora Fedora's guest image makes the perfect foundation for your fast-moving cloud project. Available in EC and

Re: Minutes from today's (12/04/2013) cloud WG meeting

2013-12-04 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:39:07 -0500 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org escribió: On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 04:16:25PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: * AGREED: cadence release to be monthly + trigger-based updates until we're more confident on

Re: Minutes from today's (12/04/2013) cloud WG meeting

2013-12-04 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Hi Dennis, thank you for your feedback. I suggest that if you want Release Engineering and QA's help as you clearly need it you properly engage with them +1 I'll repeat it as much as needed: Nobody in the WG want to add more burden to Rel-eng or QA. Either we're able to automate things or