On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:14:13PM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> That seems like a missing step in the test / QA process - one which
> I've been force to script in my own testing process for releasing on
> F22. Weren't the F21 Docker images posted to Docker Hub for anyone to
> test at some
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 03:26:36PM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>> 1. *Fedora* Atomic host and its release media / disk images / Vagrant boxes
>
> Right.
>
>> 2. Fedora 22 Docker image (which right now is a tarball and not
>> availab
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 03:26:36PM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> 1. *Fedora* Atomic host and its release media / disk images / Vagrant boxes
Right.
> 2. Fedora 22 Docker image (which right now is a tarball and not
> available on Docker Hub)
There *is* an official docker image on the hub
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 04/14/2015 09:50 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, at 09:41 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:31:49AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Here's what I'd say, lemme know if this sounds sane:
>>>
Hey all,
I'm going to be flying to SFO for Container.Camp tomorrow, so I don't
know whether I'll be able to connect for the meeting. Assuming it's
going to be a bit dicey, as my flight is scheduled to take off right
around meeting time.
Will try to make sure my tickets are updated.
Best,
jzb
--
Hi folks! As some of you know, part of the release validation process is
to make sure the fixes for blocker and freeze exception bugs are tested
and confirmed, and give karma to the updates so they can be pushed to
stable.
For F22 Beta, the following updates for blocker/FE bugs have been
included
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, at 09:41 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:31:49AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Here's what I'd say, lemme know if this sounds sane:
> [...]
> > So we've decided that while the technologies are maturing so rapidly,
> > it's better have a fast-moving
On 04/14/2015 09:50 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, at 09:41 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:31:49AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>> Here's what I'd say, lemme know if this sounds sane:
>> [...]
>>> So we've decided that while the technologies are mat
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:31:49AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Here's what I'd say, lemme know if this sounds sane:
[...]
> So we've decided that while the technologies are maturing so rapidly,
> it's better have a fast-moving remix or spin that gives users the
> opportunity to use a Fedora-base
