Ok I didn't notice the date, but, it is at least a clear set of goals. If
that's not the focus / direction of the SIG now, then I'm sure that's part
of the issue when we hear:
> "we have an image you can use, it does the
> standard things... we're kind of out of ideas to make it more interesting.
- Original Message -
> From: "Matt Micene"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 6:49:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Making Atomic the cloud edition
>
> Given:
>
> > jzb
> >
> Given that a great deal of interesting work is going into the Fedora
> > Atomic host, we'
On 08/21/2015 06:49 AM, Matt Micene wrote:
> Given:
>
> jzb
>
> Given that a great deal of interesting work is going into the Fedora
> Atomic host, we'd like to make Atomic the main deliverable/focus for the
> Cloud Working Group and Cloud edition.
>
>
> and
>
> mattdm
>
#108: Text for cloud product on getfedora.org and marketing in general
-+---
Reporter: kushal | Owner: hguemar
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: --- | Resolution:
Keywords:
Given:
> jzb
>
Given that a great deal of interesting work is going into the Fedora
> Atomic host, we'd like to make Atomic the main deliverable/focus for the
> Cloud Working Group and Cloud edition.
and
mattdm
>
For that, we need the Cloud Base to have *internal* visibility and
> connections,
