Re: REMINDER: Submission deadline for System Wide Changes of Fedora 25 in three weeks

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Do we have any system-wide changes we need to propose for F25? > > Also, seems weird to have this deadline looming before we even release > F24... :-) It is strange for me as well :-) The first reason is that F25 has been

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said: > 3. Pick a name! I know, it's bikeshed painting to some degree, but it >really is actually important. Possibilities include: > >- Fedora Container Cluster Edition >- Fedora OpenShift Edition >- Fedora Atomic Cluster Edition >-

Re: No Fedora 24 container?

On 14/06/16, Josh Berkus wrote: > https://hub.docker.com/_/fedora/ > > This seems like a big loss, especially for getting folks to test Fedora 24. > We push there only after GA. You can see the latest nightly build at [1]. [1]

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 05:04:08PM -0400, Matt Micene wrote: > I can also see the potential argument that Atomic Host on it's own wasn't > compelling enough for a full Edition. So, I hope if we do move toward an > Atomic+Origin as primary deliverable, we don't lose focus on Atomic Host >

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:09:51PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Thanks — that's good feedback. One possibility — especially as Fedora > > Server does its own rethink — is for the Fedora Cloud Base to migrate > > to Fedora Server WG. Another would be for it to continue as a Spin (or > > the analog

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

> > We've decided that, like Workstation, we want to focus on deliverable, > complete OS environments for users instead of "parts". For Container > Cloud, that looks a lot like Fedora+OpenShiftOrigin, rather than just > Atomic Host. > I feel like I've not been out of the loop (aside from the

Fwd: REMINDER: Submission deadline for System Wide Changes of Fedora 25 in three weeks

Do we have any system-wide changes we need to propose for F25? Also, seems weird to have this deadline looming before we even release F24... :-) -- Forwarded message -- From: Jan Kurik Date: Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:31 AM Subject: REMINDER: Submission deadline

[cloud] #162: Milestones, components need updating

#162: Milestones, components need updating -+ Reporter: jberkus | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Keywords: -+ The components

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-06-15

HTML Version: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-06-15/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-06-15-17.03.html Full Log: https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-06-15/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-06-15-17.03.log.html == #fedora-meeting-1:

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016, at 02:09 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > To me it is. As I said originally, something that might be > self-evident to the WG likely isn't to someone that is following the > IRC meetings, etc. It's a case of "we said we were going to do thing > X on the list, suddenly on the list

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

On 06/15/2016 11:09 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:17:34PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: steps. But, it turned out that everyone in the room (and teleconferenced in) felt pretty strongly

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:17:34PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > steps. But, it turned out that everyone in the room (and >> > teleconferenced in) felt pretty strongly that we actually should go >> > even further —

Re: [cloud] #154: make Fedora Atomic download page clearer

#154: make Fedora Atomic download page clearer ---+- Reporter: jberkus| Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: Docker Host Image | Resolution:

Re: [cloud] #153: design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)

#153: design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP) -+--- Reporter: goern| Owner: jberkus Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Resolution: Keywords:

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:17:34PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > steps. But, it turned out that everyone in the room (and > > teleconferenced in) felt pretty strongly that we actually should go > > even further — not just a single container host, but a full container > > cluster solution based on

[cloud] #161: NTP should be enabled by default on Atomic Host

#161: NTP should be enabled by default on Atomic Host ---+ Reporter: jberkus| Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: Docker Host Image |

Re: [cloud] #148: Container "Packager" Guildelines and Naming Conventions

#148: Container "Packager" Guildelines and Naming Conventions -+- Reporter: maxamillion | Owner: Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Resolution: fixed

Re: [cloud] #115: Fedora Cloud FAD (late 2015/early 2016)

#115: Fedora Cloud FAD (late 2015/early 2016) ---+ Reporter: dustymabe | Owner: dustymabe Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: Planning | Resolution: fixed Keywords:

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

On 06/15/2016 09:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > 3. Pick a name! I know, it's bikeshed painting to some degree, but it >really is actually important. Possibilities include: > >- Fedora Container Cluster Edition >- Fedora OpenShift Edition >- Fedora Atomic Cluster Edition >-

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Previously (at last year's Flock and after), we've talked about > replacing the Fedora Cloud Edition with Fedora Atomic Edition. (See > previous discussion on this list if you're unfamiliar with this > decision

Re: Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

On 06/15/2016 11:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: Previously (at last year's Flock and after), we've talked about replacing the Fedora Cloud Edition with Fedora Atomic Edition. (See previous discussion on this list if you're unfamiliar with this decision and its rationale.) We hadn't actually had

Fedora Cloud Edition next steps (→ Container Cluster!)

Previously (at last year's Flock and after), we've talked about replacing the Fedora Cloud Edition with Fedora Atomic Edition. (See previous discussion on this list if you're unfamiliar with this decision and its rationale.) We hadn't actually had much movement on _doing_ that, though, so one of