Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 17:03 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 04:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > I will note that I filed > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864 - an unavoidable > > crash when installing from the Atomic installer image - in *April*, a

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-26 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 26 August 2016 at 16:45, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 14:27 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> > >> > There are a lot of images being produced and I have no idea if they're >> > really needed. That a release blockin

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-26 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 04:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I will note that I filed > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864 - an unavoidable > crash when installing from the Atomic installer image - in *April*, and > no-one appears to care that the Atomic installer image has been br

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 14:27 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > There are a lot of images being produced and I have no idea if they're > > really needed. That a release blocking image (cloud base qcow2) nearly > > caused F25 alpha to

Re: Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree

2016-08-26 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 08/25/2016 12:05 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 08/25/2016 04:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic. >> >> Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is >> expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-26 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > There are a lot of images being produced and I have no idea if they're > really needed. That a release blocking image (cloud base qcow2) nearly > caused F25 alpha to slip because it was busted at least suggests it > probably shouldn't

Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

2016-08-26 Thread Jason Brooks
> I am also willing to volunteer for this. As the base image is moving to > server wg, and my work related to rel-eng testing side is stable, I can > refocus myself to the Fedora Atomic host in the same way I was doing > base image. Last few months were about jumping into too many things. I > hope

Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

2016-08-26 Thread Kushal Das
On 25/08/16, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 08/25/2016 02:51 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> > >> Others have made some good comments in this thread. I'm really not as > >> concerned with these specific questions. > >> > >> I think the deeper prob