[atomic-wg] Issue #153 `design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)`

2016-11-17 Thread Michael Scherer
misc added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` So I was a bit tired, and replaced "roundrobin" with "balance", then spent 5 minutes pondering why it was "balance balance" in the config file, and how did I managed to make a wrong search/replace So yeah, replacing roundrobin by

Discussion about overlay vs devicemapper for docker-storage-setup in Fedora

2016-11-17 Thread Dusty Mabe
dwalsh sent a message to the devel list about this. Follow along/respond here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JBUEITVRLFHHOPQXSSFVYL5WQA3754ZZ/ ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #153 `design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)`

2016-11-17 Thread Michael Scherer
misc added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @walters yep, origin. https://github.com/fedora-cloud/fosp-playbooks/blob/master/hosts#L42 @scollier I just see firefox asking me to always accept the certificate (even when I did accept 5 seconds ago), but I didn't dig into why (as it

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

2016-11-17 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Well, the whole point of Atomic is to be immutable: "configure once, deploy many times". Having a key piece of infrastructure depend on per-server package layering kinda breaks that. It makes it hard to explain why people should

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

2016-11-17 Thread Jason Brooks
jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > 1) it requires package layering, which really pushes up the idea of having a > way for users to build their own OStree servers. What do you mean by that? Package layering doesn't require someone to build their own ostree

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

2016-11-17 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Well, OpenShift is its own thing rather than an alternative to Kubernetes. Some people want Kube, some want OpenShift. So I've been doing a bunch with Kubeadm on AH. Jason's version does actually work, with some caveats: 1) it

[atomic-wg] Issue #178 `Fix locale support in base image.`

2016-11-17 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Sorry, that was suppsoed to be en_US, not en_UTF8. Still errors out. The problem is that C.UTF8 isn't a real locale. It's just barely good enough for English speakers, and it's useless for supporting foriegn-language speakers.

[atomic-wg] Issue #180 `Future of Fedora Dockerfiles`

2016-11-17 Thread Jason Brooks
jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @pfrields That's it, thanks -- losing PRs is the main thing I'd miss about the current Fedora-Dockerfiles going away. It'll be awesome to have pagure fronting dist-git. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this

[atomic-wg] Issue #180 `Future of Fedora Dockerfiles`

2016-11-17 Thread Paul W . Frields
pfrields added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` If I understand the question -- we are working on fronting dist-git with Pagure. By spring it would hopefully allow for PRs on dist-git, helping maintainers collaborate more easily for a bunch of common use cases. `` To reply,

[atomic-wg] Issue #180 `Future of Fedora Dockerfiles`

2016-11-17 Thread Scott Collier
scollier added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > dist-git won't allow for pull requests, will it? Not sure, @maxamillion ? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/180 ___ cloud

[atomic-wg] Issue #180 `Future of Fedora Dockerfiles`

2016-11-17 Thread Jason Brooks
jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` dist-git won't allow for pull requests, will it? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/180 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #154 `make Fedora Atomic download page clearer`

2016-11-17 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` This is going to need to be reworked for F25. After next week let's sit down and apply your sketch to the new pages. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/154