On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>> It is with great pleasure that the Fedora Project Announces the availability
>> of the Fedora Docker Layered Image Build Service[0] to the Fedora Contributor
>> Community!
>>
>> With t
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Dennis Gregorovic wrote:
>
>
> On 12/13/2016 02:36 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
>> It is with great pleasure that the Fedora Project Announces the availability
>> of the Fedora Docker Layered Image Build Service[0] to the Fedora Contributor
>> Community!
>>
>> With this
Folks,
Looking at the new FDLIBS, I'm noticing that there's not a narrative
description of the image required or provided anywhere that I can find.
Clearly one is needed for users. So, here's a proposal:
New Required LABELs:
USAGE: single command line giving usage example
f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404434
Following the process at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Container:Review_Process and the nascent
guidelines to the best of what I know.
As containers go, this isn't... super important. But I thought I'd pick
a small thing which I'm already the p
On 12/13/2016 02:36 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
> It is with great pleasure that the Fedora Project Announces the availability
> of the Fedora Docker Layered Image Build Service[0] to the Fedora Contributor
> Community!
>
> With this announcement we are opening availability of the Docker Layered
> Im
It is with great pleasure that the Fedora Project Announces the availability
of the Fedora Docker Layered Image Build Service[0] to the Fedora Contributor
Community!
With this announcement we are opening availability of the Docker Layered
Image Build Service for the Docker Layered Images[1] that t
On 12/13/2016 01:02 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
>> Are the POSIX issues in applications running on overlay mostly resolved now?
>> I.e. if we flipped the default would be reasonably able to support a
>> diverse range of Linux workloads w
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> The only way to change from one storage to the other is to use
>
> atomic storage export
> change the config
> atomic storage reset
> atomic storage import
Nifty.
A migration tool would have to juggle the potential for insufficient
space
On 12/12/2016 05:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 12/12/2016 02:24 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>> I think the rationale is that we'd like to not have a much different
>> experience whether you are using docker on atomic host or not. My
>> thoughts are that overlay is where we want to be in the future a
On 12/12/2016 05:19 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> After I get a bug[1] fixed and out the door I'm going to publish
>> a blog post/docs on setting up Fedora 25 Atomic host and/or Cloud
>> base to use overlay2 as the storage driver for docker.
>>
>
On 12/12/2016 05:16 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> On 12/12/2016 05:13 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 12/12/2016 02:12 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>> After I get a bug[1] fixed and out the door I'm going to publish
>>> a blog post/docs on setting up Fedora 25 Atomic host and/or Cloud
>>> base to use overlay
11 matches
Mail list logo
