rawhide compoe - error: unlinkat: No such file or directory

2017-06-22 Thread Dusty Mabe
hon2.7/site-packages/kobo/shortcuts.py", line 335, in run DEBUG util.py:439: raise RuntimeError(err_msg) DEBUG util.py:439: RuntimeError: ERROR running command: rpm-ostree compose tree --repo=/mnt/koji/compose/atomic/rawhide/ --write-commitid-to=/mnt/koji/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-201

[atomic-wg] Issue #281: Figure out comprehensive strategy for atomic host container storage

2017-06-22 Thread Colin Walters
walters added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Thinking of this change as "3G → 15G by default" indeed is a good and simple way to phrase it. It's not *entirely* accurate since we also need to factor in the default size of the cloud images and the vagrant box. But it's a good

[atomic-wg] Issue #281: Figure out comprehensive strategy for atomic host container storage

2017-06-22 Thread Vivek Goyal
vgoyal added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I think I am missing something. So rootfs which used to be 3G by default will now be 15G by default. Ok, so for cloud images we will continue to have volume group and when image is grown, additional space will go in volume group and

[atomic-wg] Issue #281: Figure out comprehensive strategy for atomic host container storage

2017-06-22 Thread Colin Walters
walters added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @vgoyal: Not quite; the AH storage is the same as Server, we only use up to 15G. For real baremetal machines, they'll have larger disks, and hence there will be reserved space in the VG. For cloud images, it's up to the operator;

[atomic-wg] Issue #281: Figure out comprehensive strategy for atomic host container storage

2017-06-22 Thread Vivek Goyal
vgoyal added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` So this relies on that fact that atomic users will not use devicemapper graph driver. If they really need to use devicemapper, they will need to add additional disk. (Which requires extra effort and planning). So has this been

[atomic-wg] Issue #281: Figure out comprehensive strategy for atomic host container storage

2017-06-22 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` seems sane to me - i asked @dwalsh and @vgoyal to weigh in - also i'll bring this up in the next meeting we have. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/281