Hi folks!
So I was looking through testcase_stats for F27 and I noticed several
tests that haven't been run for some time, which we will need to run
for Final. If folks could help out with running some of these, that'll
be great. The current validation candidate (20171020.n.0) is fine,
there shoul
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `Add treefile for f27-updates-testing`
that you are following:
``
LGTM
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/89
___
cloud mailing list -- clou
dustymabe merged a pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Add treefile for f27-updates-testing
``
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/89
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedorap
puiterwijk commented on the pull-request: `Add treefile for
f27-updates-testing` that you are following:
``
Well, I was hoping that this would be fixed before F27 final RC (aka, before we
start building the updates tree). If that doesn't happen, I'll add the stable
one.
But it seems I couldn't
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `Add treefile for f27-updates-testing`
that you are following:
``
hmm - we'll need one for 'updates' and for 'testing'
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/89
__
puiterwijk opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that
you are following:
``
Add treefile for f27-updates-testing
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/89
___
dustymabe merged a pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Add secondary treefiles for updates and update-test (F26)
``
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/88
___
cloud mailing list -
walters commented on the pull-request: `Add secondary treefiles for updates and
update-test (F26)` that you are following:
``
Sure, seems sane to me. (Just to repeat though the reason I chose JSON is
precisely to allow tools to edit the treefile easily)
``
To reply, visit the link below or jus
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `Add secondary treefiles for updates
and update-test (F26)` that you are following:
``
LGTM, @walters, WDYT?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/88
___
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `Add secondary treefiles for updates
and update-test (F26)` that you are following:
``
we need this *for now* because fedmsg-atomic-composer had a feature that pungi
does not yet have, which is the ability to specify what ref we are creating a
commit for
puiterwijk opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that
you are following:
``
Add secondary treefiles for updates and update-test (F26)
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/88
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
