Re: [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20170213: Possible failure on bare metal

2017-02-14 Thread Colin Walters
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017, at 02:32 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-lorax-templates/pull-request/11 I think this makes sense, though there's a bigger-picture issue here. We should default to "install from the embedded content" rather than requiring kickstart users to specify

Re: [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20170213: Possible failure on bare metal

2017-02-14 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 02/14/2017 10:45 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 02/14/2017 06:33 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> On 02/13/2017 10:42 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> On 02/13/2017 07:32 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: We are going to try to release our next 2WA release this week. Feel free to test out today's build

Re: [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20170213: Possible failure on bare metal

2017-02-14 Thread Josh Berkus
On 02/14/2017 06:33 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 02/13/2017 10:42 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 02/13/2017 07:32 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> We are going to try to release our next 2WA release this week. >>> Feel free to test out today's build and see if there are any issues! >>> >>> The atomic

Re: [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20170213: Possible failure on bare metal

2017-02-14 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 02/13/2017 10:42 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 02/13/2017 07:32 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> We are going to try to release our next 2WA release this week. >> Feel free to test out today's build and see if there are any issues! >> >> The atomic images are here: >> >>

Re: [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20170213: Possible failure on bare metal

2017-02-13 Thread Josh Berkus
On 02/13/2017 07:32 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > We are going to try to release our next 2WA release this week. > Feel free to test out today's build and see if there are any issues! > > The atomic images are here: > >