[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` kubernetes rpms are in the install tree now: https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/39 the images produced tonight should have the content in there. Let's close this issue if testing is successful there. `` To reply, visit

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Some updates: * the issue of fedora having an aged kube is resolved, v1.4.5 is in f25 stable * the issue of not being able to just `rpm-ostree install kubernetes` and proceed as if we never removed kube from the image is open.

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` kube 1.4.5 for f25 in bodhi: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fffea4b1c3 I've been working on getting it running in rpm-installed node pkgs / master pkgs in containers. Notes on that here:

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Well, the whole point of Atomic is to be immutable: "configure once, deploy many times". Having a key piece of infrastructure depend on per-server package layering kinda breaks that. It makes it hard to explain why people should

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > 1) it requires package layering, which really pushes up the idea of having a > way for users to build their own OStree servers. What do you mean by that? Package layering doesn't require someone to build their own ostree

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Well, OpenShift is its own thing rather than an alternative to Kubernetes. Some people want Kube, some want OpenShift. So I've been doing a bunch with Kubeadm on AH. Jason's version does actually work, with some caveats: 1) it

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` as an alternative for now I have been working on getting the openshift-ansible installer to work against F25 atomic host. I have opened up several issuses: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/issues/2808

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

gscrivano added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` There are already two system containers for etcd and flannel, already available on Docker hub as gscrivano/etcd and gscrivano/flannel. I'll move them to Fedora as soon as you tell me how to proceed for doing that. There is no

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

dwalsh added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I have asked Giuseppe Scrivano to move forward on system containers to implement kubernetes workflow on atomic host. He currently has most of services available as system containers and is moving them into

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > > There's a kube 1.4.5 in koji for fc26 > (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=816481), and I've asked > Jan about making it available for fedora 25. > > Can you keep us in the loop here on the progress of

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > There's a kube 1.4.5 in koji for fc26 > (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=816481), and I've asked > Jan about making it available for fedora 25. Can you keep us in the loop here on the progress of this one?

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

jasonbrooks reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` We removed kubernetes, etcd, flannel, gluster and ceph from the atomic host for Fedora 25: https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/c/219c9bb26426811a5f32188c59682ad70c3283e5?branch=f25 The idea is that these