On 08/25/2016 12:05 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 08/25/2016 04:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic.
>>
>> Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is
>> expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the
On 08/25/2016 04:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic.
>
> Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is
> expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the two week release?
>
Hey Peter,
Thanks for the
> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic.
Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is
expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the two week release?
Peter
> On 08/23/2016 10:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> The atomic ISO images are using
Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic.
Dusty
On 08/23/2016 10:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> The atomic ISO images are using the wrong tree. The images built on
> 8/23 [1] yield the following system after an install:
>
> -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status
> TIMESTAMP
Adding atomic-devel
On 08/23/2016 10:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> The atomic ISO images are using the wrong tree. The images built on
> 8/23 [1] yield the following system after an install:
>
> -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status
> TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME
The atomic ISO images are using the wrong tree. The images built on
8/23 [1] yield the following system after an install:
-bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status
TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAMEREFSPEC
* 2016-06-15
