On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Michael P. McGrath
> wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Matthew Miller"
>>> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
>>> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Michael P. McGrath wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Matthew Miller"
>> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
>> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:17:31 AM
>> Subject: Re: basic plan for two-week atomic images
>&
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 03:23:39PM -0400, Michael P. McGrath wrote:
> Kubernetes might be removed from the list soon if we can containerize it,
> there's extra work to do so but that might simplify the atomic builds a bit.
Which in turn brings up the "we need to be able to deliver layered
images"
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:17:31 AM
> Subject: Re: basic plan for two-week atomic images
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:37:18AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> > >
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:37:18AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> >> > 2. Images built from those nightly (I think right now only rawhide?)
> >> once f22 is final only rawhide.
> > What would it take to make those happen post-release?
> If we could get a clearly defined list of what these items are I
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:11:51AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> I, for one, care a lot - but have been buried. Sorry.
>
> Yeah, ditto. There was this whole F22 release thing that happened. :)
>
Totally understandable, it's just difficul
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:11:51AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> I, for one, care a lot - but have been buried. Sorry.
Yeah, ditto. There was this whole F22 release thing that happened. :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
cloud mailing li
On Friday, June 12, 2015 10:00:43 AM Adam Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Adam Miller
>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Matthew Miller
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:14:51PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >>> > 1. F22 trees built nightly (already
On 06/12/2015 11:00 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how much people actually care about this since I never
> got a response to my previous email. However, I did at least want to
> follow up with a status update because this is something I have a
> personal interest in as I'm a big fan of A
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:14:51PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> > 1. F22 trees built nightly (already happening)
>>> there is new atomic trees built as part of the package update
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:14:51PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> > 1. F22 trees built nightly (already happening)
>> there is new atomic trees built as part of the package updates
>> process managed by bodhi.
>
> Cool.
>
>> > 2. Images bui
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 02:14:02PM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> A diagram of the artifacts (images, RPMs, issues, source repositories,
> etc.) and how they interact would be very helpful to those of us who
> are mostly users.
I agree, that'd be helpful. I'll let this conversation go a co
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:14:51PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > 1. F22 trees built nightly (already happening)
> there is new atomic trees built as part of the package updates
> process managed by bodhi.
Cool.
> > 2. Images built from those nightly (I think right now only rawhide?)
> once f22
On Thursday, May 21, 2015 04:25:42 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
> This is a strawman based on my understanding of current abilities,
> available software/systems, and of what the developers want. Please
> poke holes, reorder, add and subtract, etc.
>
> Phase I
>
> 1. F22 trees built nightly (already
A diagram of the artifacts (images, RPMs, issues, source repositories,
etc.) and how they interact would be very helpful to those of us who
are mostly users.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> This is a strawman based on my understanding of current abilities,
> available sof
This is a strawman based on my understanding of current abilities,
available software/systems, and of what the developers want. Please
poke holes, reorder, add and subtract, etc.
Phase I
1. F22 trees built nightly (already happening)
2. Images built from those nightly (I think right now only rawh
16 matches
Mail list logo
