Re: [cloud] #153: design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)

[Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets]

#153: design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)
-+---
 Reporter:  goern|   Owner:  jberkus
 Type:  task |  Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal   |   Milestone:  Future
Component:  ---  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  meeting  |
-+---

Comment (by jdetiber):

 Why fork, I have no issues carrying the patched seboolean module in
 openshift-ansible until we can require a version of ansible that has the
 fix.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
cloud 
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [cloud] #153: design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)

[Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets]

#153: design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)
-+---
 Reporter:  goern|   Owner:  jberkus
 Type:  task |  Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal   |   Milestone:  Future
Component:  ---  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  meeting  |
-+---

Comment (by misc):

 Periodic update time. The dns related issue have been fixed (with dnsmasq
 and hosts), and now, we bumped into https://github.com/openshift
 /openshift-ansible/issues/2294

 I am a bit unsure on the way to bypass it, between "patching openshift-
 ansible", and "carrying a fixed version of seboolean".

-- 
Ticket URL: 
cloud 
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org