[atomic-wg] Issue #287: Identify group of people interested in maintaining kubernetes

2017-06-28 Thread suiwenfeng
suiwenfeng added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I am interested in kubernetes, please let me in. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.f

[atomic-wg] Issue #287: Identify group of people interested in maintaining kubernetes

2017-06-28 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @sjenning well, we have to repackage based on Fedora or centOS base images with each Kubeadm release, so that's some ongoing work. There's also a bunch of other config stuff which doesn't currently work "out of the box" and would be

[atomic-wg] Issue #228: clarify policy on atomic host support for older Fedora "number" releases

2017-06-28 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` fed mag post here: https://fedoramagazine.org/upcoming-fedora-atomic-lifecycle-changes/ `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/228 ___

[atomic-wg] Issue #228: clarify policy on atomic host support for older Fedora "number" releases

2017-06-28 Thread Dusty Mabe
The status of the issue: `clarify policy on atomic host support for older Fedora "number" releases` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/228 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.

[atomic-wg] Issue #266: rpmostree_compose Ansible module

2017-06-28 Thread 吉拉德
gbraad added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Still in dev? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/266 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

[atomic-wg] Issue #281: Figure out comprehensive strategy for atomic host container storage

2017-06-28 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Discussed in the atomic working group meeting today: *changing fedora 27 and beyond to default to overlayfs on the root partition will help us simplify our storage setup and align better with other fedora variants. This seems like

[atomic-wg] Issue #289: Investigating the possibility to have an Atomic Host LiveCD

2017-06-28 Thread 吉拉德
gbraad reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` At the moment we run a CentOS-based livecd to run our VM environment, but we would really like to target an Atomic Host. I have been looking into generating an image using the kickstart at https://github.com

Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2017-06-21

2017-06-28 Thread Dusty Mabe
summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora_atomic_wg/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-06-21-17.03.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora_atomic_wg/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-06-21-17.03.log.html === #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_wg ===

Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2017-06-28

2017-06-28 Thread Dusty Mabe
summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-06-28/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-06-28-17.01.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-06-28/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-06-28-17.01.log.html === #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_

[atomic-wg] Issue #283: please include documentation for run label inside Fedora container guidelines

2017-06-28 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` The guidelines link to the official Atomic CLI documentation. Is there a specific link to in-depth RUN docs we can use? This needs to be a web link, not a man page. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email http

[atomic-wg] Issue #290: Make fedora-minimal base image generally available

2017-06-28 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` A "minimal" build of the base container image exists, but isn't official or generally available from the repository. We need this minimal image for a few reasons: * users care about container size from so

[atomic-wg] Issue #290: Make fedora-minimal base image generally available

2017-06-28 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Is it possible to make the minimal image the base of the regular image? That seems ideal from a testing perspective (not to mention explosion of streams). I've had in the back of my mind for a while the idea of fedora-minimal and fedo

[atomic-wg] Issue #290: Make fedora-minimal base image generally available

2017-06-28 Thread Josh Berkus
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Theoretically, yes. I'd let @maxamillion comment on whether that's practical. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/290 ___ cloud ma

[atomic-wg] Issue #290: Make fedora-minimal base image generally available

2017-06-28 Thread Dusty Mabe
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` theoretically yes, but we do some stuff to the minimal image to reduce the image size that we'd then have to undo. I don't think it really makes sense. You can see for yourself: [minimal kickstart](https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstar

[atomic-wg] Issue #290: Make fedora-minimal base image generally available

2017-06-28 Thread Matthew Miller
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` That's less than I expected, really. :) (And some of it really random. From coreutils, we loose `pinky` but not `base32` (which isn't in EL7 and I'd never heard of... but that's another story.) I'd really love to see a bug associated