Re: RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

[Matthew Miller]

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:55:52AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/ProjectFAO
> Bumping thread in hopes of starting a discussion.

Thanks for the thread bump. The previous came right before Summit and
so there's my excuse. I'm definitely in support of this and I think the
notes on that wiki page capture the cloud FAD accurately.

I'm working on the "incubator" aspect mentioned there, and hope to make
progress on that — realistically after Flock.

Would it help if I draw up a logic model diagram as seen in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Fedora_Modularization,_Prototype_Phase
 
?

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Minutes from 7/20

[Jason Brooks]

==
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_cloud_wg
==


Meeting started by jbrooks at 17:00:08 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-07-20/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-07-20-17.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---
* Roll Call  (jbrooks, 17:00:17)

* discuss Post-GA Cadence  (jbrooks, 17:02:39)
  * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/155   (jbrooks,
17:03:01)
  * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/138   (kushal, 17:09:32)
  * ACTION: jbrooks to update / run down issues around two-week repo
(jbrooks, 17:23:22)

* issue 136 https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/136  (jbrooks,
  17:25:01)

* other open items  (jbrooks, 17:28:12)

* open floor  (jbrooks, 17:38:57)

Meeting ended at 17:57:09 UTC.




Action Items

* jbrooks to update / run down issues around two-week repo




Action Items, by person
---
* jbrooks
  * jbrooks to update / run down issues around two-week repo
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---
* jbrooks (64)
* dustymabe (57)
* kushal (42)
* jberkus (35)
* maxamillion (20)
* zodbot (17)
* jzb (11)
* walters (9)
* bowlofeggs (7)
* sayan (5)
* jkurik (4)
* scollier (2)
* tflink (2)
* nzwulfin (1)
* trishnag (1)
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

[Josh Berkus]

On 07/20/2016 11:02 AM, Devan Goodwin wrote:
> A few comments regarding openshift-ansible. I think the master branch in the 
> repo can probably cover Fedora quite easily at least at this point in time, I 
> don't think there's a whole lot in there that would be an issue.
> 
> We're also quite well set up to deploy, manage, and upgrade containerized 
> OpenShift deployments. (however this all uses docker today) This is only 
> tested on RHEL and RHEL Atomic today (AFAIK) but the mechanism for doing it 
> should already cover CentOS and Fedora Atomic variants and I suspect this 
> would be extremely easy to get working, if it didn't just work out of the box 
> today.
> 
> We have not started down the system containers path in openshift-ansible but 
> we very much are looking forward to that, so the work would be relevant and 
> if the Fedora community began some of that work, I think I can safely say 
> we'd jump at the chance to work and get it merged ASAP.
> 
> Please feel free to loop me in if there are questions, I genuinely think you 
> could be doing a lot of this very quickly with current master of 
> openshift-ansible.

Thanks!

Is there a way I can reach you on IRC or Slack for detailed questions?

-- 
--
Josh Berkus
Project Atomic
Red Hat OSAS
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

[Devan Goodwin]

A few comments regarding openshift-ansible. I think the master branch in the 
repo can probably cover Fedora quite easily at least at this point in time, I 
don't think there's a whole lot in there that would be an issue.

We're also quite well set up to deploy, manage, and upgrade containerized 
OpenShift deployments. (however this all uses docker today) This is only tested 
on RHEL and RHEL Atomic today (AFAIK) but the mechanism for doing it should 
already cover CentOS and Fedora Atomic variants and I suspect this would be 
extremely easy to get working, if it didn't just work out of the box today.

We have not started down the system containers path in openshift-ansible but we 
very much are looking forward to that, so the work would be relevant and if the 
Fedora community began some of that work, I think I can safely say we'd jump at 
the chance to work and get it merged ASAP.

Please feel free to loop me in if there are questions, I genuinely think you 
could be doing a lot of this very quickly with current master of 
openshift-ansible.
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [cloud] #154: make Fedora Atomic download page clearer

[Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets]

#154: make Fedora Atomic download page clearer
---+---
 Reporter:  jberkus|   Owner:  jberkus
 Type:  task   |  Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal |   Milestone:  Future
Component:  Docker Host Image  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  Meeting|
---+---

Comment (by jberkus):

 Now that the downloads page is back up, I'll recommend some minor changes.
 Major changes will come when we change the primary deliverables.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
cloud 
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [cloud] #155: Decide on post-GA update cadence for various deliverables

[Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets]

#155: Decide on post-GA update cadence for various deliverables
-+--
 Reporter:  maxamillion  |   Owner:  jasonbrooks
 Type:  task |  Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal   |   Milestone:  Future
Component:  ---  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  meeting  |
-+--
Changes (by jasonbrooks):

 * owner:   => jasonbrooks
 * status:  new => assigned


-- 
Ticket URL: 
cloud 
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [cloud] #156: Need complete Kickstart docs for Atomic Host

[Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets]

#156: Need complete Kickstart docs for Atomic Host
---+---
 Reporter:  jberkus|   Owner:  jberkus
 Type:  task   |  Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal |   Milestone:  Future
Component:  Docker Host Image  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  Meeting|
---+---
Changes (by jasonbrooks):

 * owner:   => jberkus
 * status:  new => assigned


-- 
Ticket URL: 
cloud 
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [cloud] #125: Fedora-Dockerfiles examples for Kubernetes

[Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets]

#125: Fedora-Dockerfiles examples for Kubernetes
--+---
 Reporter:  scollier  |   Owner:  jberkus
 Type:  task  |  Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal|   Milestone:  Future
Component:  ---   |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  meeting   |
--+---

Comment (by jberkus):

 We will have some examples around Flock.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
cloud 
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [cloud] #153: design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)

[Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets]

#153: design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)
-+---
 Reporter:  goern|   Owner:  jberkus
 Type:  task |  Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal   |   Milestone:  Future
Component:  ---  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  meeting  |
-+---

Comment (by jberkus):

 This is currently in a holding pattern around hosting.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
cloud 
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org