Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out today[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora
sayanchowdhury added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
The last deployment missed the fact that the snapshot needs to be explicitly
made public in each region.
I did a new release of fedimg == 0.7.5 today. Everything seems fine on staging.
``
To reply, visit the link below or
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 18:25 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
>
> ID: 118103Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/118103
This looks like a case of
bowlofeggs added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> Doing this would maintain compatibility with people doing docker build on
> their local machine and testing things out.
Good point.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
ID: 118103 Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/118103
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 118104
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
the docs for the vagrant cloud api are sparse. I found where someone created
some scripts to access the API - maybe we can clean some information from there:
On 07/06/2017 09:41 AM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree commit:
>
> Commit: ce555fa89da934e6eef23764fb40e8333234b8b60b6f68847c958e5ebd5b
> Version: 25.154
>
>
> Existing systems can be upgraded in place via e.g. `atomic host
jwboyer added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
>
> To clarify, does atomic @lists.fedoraproject.org actually exist now, or
> would that be a new list request? I can't find it on
> lists.fedoraproject.org, so I'm assuming the latter.
>
> it exists now but I would prefer
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> There was a discussion before about moving Cloud Base under Server; that
> makes some sense to me. Then we could cleanly close the cloud@ list and
> really in general stop talking about Cloud, which reduces confusion.
>
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> To clarify, does atomic @lists.fedoraproject.org actually exist now, or
> would that be a new list request? I can't find it on
> lists.fedoraproject.org, so I'm assuming the latter.
it exists now but I would prefer people not
jwboyer added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
To clarify, does atomic @lists.fedoraproject.org actually exist now, or would
that be a new list request? I can't find it on lists.fedoraproject.org, so I'm
assuming the latter.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
ok - what I'd like to do is offer up some suggestions on how the people in this
group would like to collaborate with each other as well as with the rest of
Fedora (including the atomic working group).
- do we create a new issue
dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
Target Date: Last week of July
Let's have a VFAD to help us find all of our docs that exist in the wiki and
create an index of all of them. I suggest we actually have the index as our
README for
13 matches
Mail list logo
