Re: [cloud] #144: f23 atomic iso configures docker loopback storage

On 12/09/2015 07:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets > wrote: >> #144: f23 atomic iso configures docker loopback storage >> I looked over the kickstarts, but I'm not clear on what might be causing >> this. >>

Re: [cloud] #144: f23 atomic iso configures docker loopback storage

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 05:20:28PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets > wrote: > > #144: f23 atomic iso configures docker loopback storage > > I looked over the kickstarts, but I'm not clear on what might be

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2015-12-09

html version: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-12-09/cloud_wg.2015-12-09-17.02.html full log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-12-09/cloud_wg.2015-12-09-17.02.log.html === #fedora-meeting-1: cloud_wg ===

Re: Add net.ifnames=0 to Atomic host

On 12/10/2015 11:11 AM, Colin Walters wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: This commit is against master.. Can you apply the change to the f23 branch? Done: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/commit/?h=f23 This worked. The device inside the vm

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 12/15/2015 05:20 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here: >

Re: root on btrfs and lvmthinp for docker backing confusion

On 12/10/2015 08:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Jason Brooks wrote: > >> You can ignore docker-storage-setup and edit /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage >> yourself. > > OK I've done "systemctl disable docker-storage-setup" > >> >> Here's what

Re: Putting Networkd on cloud Atomic and base image for F24

On 12/14/2015 03:55 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:31:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> The situation is not at all the same; there is no clear expectation >> that networkd will replace NetworkManager, indeed AFAIK it's been >> explicitly stated that it won't, because

Re: Putting Networkd on cloud Atomic and base image for F24

On 12/14/2015 03:57 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 12/14/2015 03:23 PM, Kushal Das wrote: >> The third choice is already in the images along with systemd. We are >> talking about enabling it as default networking stack. Ubuntu already >> has a beta implementation in place with network instead of

Re: Add net.ifnames=0 to Atomic host

On 12/09/2015 01:45 PM, Colin Walters wrote: On Wed, Dec 9, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: On 12/04/2015 02:16 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 10:35 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> Right, this would affect them all. As you mention below

Overwriting download location for 2 week atomic releases

I opened a ticket to discuss the download location of the two week atomic releases. https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/147 Please check it out. If you want to vote in the ticket so we don't have to wait til next weeks meeting that would be great. Dusty

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 12/22/2015 11:18 AM, Adam Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 12/22/2015 10:41 AM, Adam Miller wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrot

Re: Cancel next two meetings?

On 12/21/2015 10:36 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 12/21/2015 09:45 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> I can't recall if we discussed this last time - but I suspect many folks >> are going to be on vacation this and next Wednesday. Shall we cancel

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 12/22/2015 10:41 AM, Adam Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 12/15/2015 05:20 PM, Adam Miller wrote: >>> A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be >>> do

Re: Cancel next two meetings?

On 12/21/2015 09:45 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Hey all, I can't recall if we discussed this last time - but I suspect many folks are going to be on vacation this and next Wednesday. Shall we cancel those meetings and plan to re-adjourn on the 6th? +1

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2015-11-25

html version: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-11-25/cloud_wg.2015-11-25-17.00.html full log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-11-25/cloud_wg.2015-11-25-17.00.log.html === #fedora-meeting-1: cloud wg

Re: Cloud Meeting Minutes 2015-11-25

Test replying to mail in hyperkitty interface. ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rel-Eng builder boxes can't run qemu-kvm on F23

On 11/19/2015 09:41 AM, Cole Robinson wrote: On 11/19/2015 09:35 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: Basically this means we can't build any images (rawhide/Fedora23/etc) because the builder hosts have been moved to Fedora 23. The following BZ has more info. Please discuss in the bug if you have comments

Fedora Rel-Eng builder boxes can't run qemu-kvm on F23

Basically this means we can't build any images (rawhide/Fedora23/etc) because the builder hosts have been moved to Fedora 23. The following BZ has more info. Please discuss in the bug if you have comments about the technicals. Please discuss here otherwise.

No Fedora Cloud Meeting Today: 2016-06-08

There are a lot of people that are at the Cloud FAD today so we won't have a regularly scheduled IRC meeting. Feel free to join us (virtually) for the FAD. See the etherpad link in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Cloud_WG_2016 ___ cloud mailing

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 06/08/2016 11:05 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016, at 01:11 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> The Vagrant Atlas page with the new atomic host: > > This doesn't work for me > > (Update: all the links appear broken) > > $ vagrant box update >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 06/07/2016 02:52 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

Re: F24 karma requests (blocker/FE fixes)

Hey Adam, For the Cloud bug, kushal built an image today and we verified this issue. I don't know of anyone else who is going to build their own image to test this. Is it possible for us to push to stable with the 1 karma? Dusty On 06/07/2016 11:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 05/24/2016 04:20 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

No RPM DB in latest Fedora 23 atomic images

The tests are failing for the latest Fedora 23 atomic images: https://pagure.io/atomic-images/issue/36 There seems to be no rpm db inside the image: -bash-4.3# rpm -qa -bash-4.3# echo $? 0 ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No RPM DB in latest Fedora 23 atomic images

On 06/13/2016 03:51 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016, at 02:42 PM, Colin Walters wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016, at 09:18 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> The tests are failing for the latest Fedora 23 atomic images: >>> >>

Re: No RPM DB in latest Fedora 23 atomic images

On 06/13/2016 04:19 PM, Jonathan Lebon wrote: > - Original Message - >> The tests are failing for the latest Fedora 23 atomic images: >> >> https://pagure.io/atomic-images/issue/36 >> >> There seems to be no rpm db inside the image: >> >> -bash-4.3# rpm -qa >> -bash-4.3# echo $? >> 0 >

Re: Docker image from website is broken: invalid name

On 05/28/2016 09:21 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Saturday, May 28, 2016 12:04:04 PM CDT Sedrubal wrote: >> Hey there, >> >> I just tried to use the fedora docker container from >> https://getfedora.org/en/ cloud/download/docker.html , but it isn't >> working: >> >> Docker (1.10.3) complains

Re: Automating updates to apps.openstack.org to point to new Fedora Cloud Image releases?

On 05/24/2016 04:22 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> As some of you might know there is an application catalog for OpenStack at >> apps.openstack.org. "Applications" on this site are thus far distributed as >>

Re: Do we want to make a restaurant reservation for the FAD?

On 05/26/2016 03:36 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > Do we want to make an evening restaurant reservation for one or both > nights of the FAD? I can set this up, just want to know what we're > planning. > I'm +1 for Tuesday Night. I leave Wednesday night so might not be able to make that.

Re: Do we want to make a restaurant reservation for the FAD?

On 05/26/2016 04:05 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 05/26/2016 03:36 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> Do we want to make an evening restaurant reservation for one or both >> nights of the FAD? I can set this up, just want to know what we're >> planning. > > Yeah. I can recommend a few places here: >

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-06-01

html version: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-06-01/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-06-01-17.03.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-06-01/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-06-01-17.03.log.html == #fedora-meeting-1:

Re: No Fedora 24 container?

On 06/22/2016 08:35 AM, Adam Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 09:43:26PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> https://hub.docker.com/_/fedora/ >>> This seems like a big loss, especially for getting folks to

Fedora 24 Cloud Base Vagrant in Atlas

Atlas has been updated for Fedora 24 Cloud Base: https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora/boxes/24-cloud-base/versions/20160621 You can now: vagrant init fedora/24-cloud-base && vagrant up ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

listed atomic AMIs

When selecting an AMI to use in EC2 for Atomic I went to the getfedora page and I selected `ami-f18fff9b`. I booted this AMI and I see: -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSIONID OSNAMEREFSPEC * 2015-10-29 03:54:57 23 f85f5e7bfc

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 01/12/2016 05:38 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be downloaded at: Images can be found here: https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-02-10

html version: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-02-10/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-02-10-17.00.html full log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-02-10/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-02-10-17.00.log.html == #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Cloud WG

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 02/12/2016 01:08 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:35 AM, wrote: >> >> A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be >> downloaded at: >> >> Images can be found here: >> >>

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 01/27/2016 10:38 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be downloaded at: Images can be found here: https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:

Regrets for today's meeting

Hi all, I'm in some face-to-face meetings so I won't be able to make the cloud irc meeting. As for action items: I closed ticket #99 for sayan and I updated ticket #138 with information that we are pushing releasing updated cloud images to the F24 release. Dusty

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 02/23/2016 04:54 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 02/23/2016 04:54 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

Re: Compose check emails: please allow mails from rawhide@fp.o

On 01/22/2016 04:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 08:56 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, folks! As requested by acarter, I've set things up such that a 'compose check' email - like the ones for Rawhide and Branched nightly composes, listing missing images and openQA test

Re: Vagrant now prefer dnf over yum

On 01/21/2016 04:19 AM, Rickard von Essen wrote: Hi! Just wanted to inform all that Vagrant 1.8.0 or later uses dnf instead of yum if it is available on Fedora guests, see https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/pull/6288 . Nice Which makes the comment at

Re: listed atomic AMIs

On 01/16/2016 09:23 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: When selecting an AMI to use in EC2 for Atomic I went to the getfedora page and I selected `ami-f18fff9b`. I booted this AMI and I see: -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSIONID OSNAMEREFSPEC * 2015-10

Error when rebasing to testing tree

I am getting an error when trying to rebase to the updates-testing ostree. It is a similar fsetxattr error we have seen in the past: # Go to known reproducer starting point: -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree deploy 23.54 && reboot # After reboot: -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree rebase

Re: [atomic-devel] Error when rebasing to testing tree

On 02/16/2016 12:27 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> writes: > >> I am getting an error when trying to rebase to the updates-testing >> ostree. It is a similar fsetxattr error we have seen in the past: >> >> >> # Go to kno

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-02-17

html version: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-02-17/cloud_wg.2016-02-17-17.00.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-02-17/cloud_wg.2016-02-17-17.00.log.html === #fedora-meeting-1: cloud wg

Re: Fedora MOTD status

On 03/10/2016 07:01 AM, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi all, > > fedora-motd-0.1.1-1 package has been pushed to "updates-testing" repo > today, with some fixes, on top of fedora-motd-0.1-1. > > I built a f23 cloud base vagrant image after patching fedora-motd > related changes[1] on top of

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

On 03/13/2016 03:04 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - > >> From: "Kai Qiang Wu" >> To: "Steve Gordon" >> Cc: "Ton Ngo" >> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 5:07:17 AM >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 04/05/2016 04:16 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

Re: Regrets for today's meeting

On 03/16/2016 08:03 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hey all, > > I will not be attending today's meeting, attending Great Wide Open in > Atlanta. Same here.. Except in all day meetings :) I'll try to lurk if I can. Dusty ___ cloud mailing list

Re: Retiring 32-bit images

On 03/23/2016 01:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! > > So I noticed today that F24 nightly composes are missing Cloud images. > This is, I think, because 32-bit Cloud image generation is still > enabled for F24, and it's failing due to the known kernel bug > preventing 32-bit boot

Re: Please help test Fedora 24 Alpha candidate 7 (RC)

On 03/22/2016 09:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! We have a new Fedora 24 Alpha candidate compose (like an 'RC' > in earlier cycles) and go/no-go is tomorrow, so if you could please > help test it, that would be great! > > The Cloud validation test page is here: > >

New meeting time

It seems as if people are overbooked at the current meeting time (17:00 UTC). Shall we try to find an alternative? Dusty ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

On 03/31/2016 03:05 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 03/31/2016 02:17 PM, Kushal Das wrote: >> Did we ever put a post up on fedmag about this? Can we do one now? >> No iirc. We may want to do one. > > Hed: Retiring 32-bit Cloud Images > > Body: The Fedora Cloud Working Group has decided to

[PATCH] cloud-base-vagrant: Add sshfs to support vagrant-sshfs plugin

Adding sshfs into the image will make it so that users won't have to wait for the package to be installed on bringup. --- fedora-cloud-base-vagrant.ks | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/fedora-cloud-base-vagrant.ks b/fedora-cloud-base-vagrant.ks index df338d7..f7f1518 100644

Re: Automating updates to apps.openstack.org to point to new Fedora Cloud Image releases?

On 05/20/2016 09:11 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: > Hi folks, > Hey Steve, > As some of you might know there is an application catalog for OpenStack at > apps.openstack.org. "Applications" on this site are thus far distributed as > Murano packages, Heat templates, and (most relevant to this group)

docker does not work in F24 Atomic

Hey All, As far as I can tell Docker is broken in F24 atomic. We have had issues with docker for a while now but testing on fedora cloud base from the updates-testing repo seemed to show the problem as resolved. However, now that docker-1.10.3-7.gita41254f.fc24.x86_64 is in stable we now see

Karma to get last F24 Atomic Host bug fixed

Need testing for new selinux so we can fix the final Atomic Host bug for F24 [1]. The karma needs to be applied at [2]. To test on F24 atomic host today you can do: ostree admin unlock --hotfix curl -O

Re: Karma to get last F24 Atomic Host bug fixed

On 05/13/2016 06:50 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > Good work everyone! We are almost there. Only need 1 more +1 and this > update might make it into stable today! > > Now who is going to step up to the plate? :) > Turns out it was runcom :) - This update has enough karma now

Re: Karma to get last F24 Atomic Host bug fixed

Good work everyone! We are almost there. Only need 1 more +1 and this update might make it into stable today! Now who is going to step up to the plate? :) Dusty On 05/12/2016 09:16 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > Need testing for new selinux so we can fix the final Atomic Host bug > f

Re: [atomic-devel] docker does not work in F24 Atomic

On 05/11/2016 02:40 PM, Antonio Murdaca wrote: > upgrading oci-register-machine made this working again (it was related to > this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328961) indeed. I was able to workaround by doing: ostree admin unlock --hotfix curl -O

Re: [PATCH] cloud-base-vagrant: use extlinux to match cloud-base

On 05/03/2016 07:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >> If we don't do this it will try to use grub2 but will fail >> because we removed the packages from the package set. > > And does extlinux work i

Re: [PATCH] cloud-base-vagrant: use extlinux to match cloud-base

On 05/04/2016 05:03 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On 05/03/2016 07:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >>>> If we don't do this it will try to use grub2 but will fail >>>> because

Fedora 24 Atomic Images are being built against rawhide

It appears our F24 atomic images are actually building against rawhide. If you boot the latest build [1] then you will see `Fedora 25` and if you look at the kickstart that was used [2] it is specifying the rawhide tree. This is odd though since it appears that the kickstart file in

Re: Fedora 24 Atomic Images are being built against rawhide

On 05/01/2016 03:24 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >> >> It appears our F24 atomic images are actually building against rawhide. If >> you boot >> the latest build [1] then you wil

[PATCH 3/3] do not remove grub2

From: Dennis Gilmore Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore (cherry picked from commit fb40fd6d03d1f10cfbc968387877d8ef6eaaf067) --- fedora-cloud-base.ks | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fedora-cloud-base.ks b/fedora-cloud-base.ks index

[PATCH 1/3] switch the cloud base image to grub for Alpha

From: Dennis Gilmore Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore (cherry picked from commit 932524c849524eabe9ec8b56ed4f85396a22b0ad) --- fedora-cloud-base.ks | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fedora-cloud-base.ks b/fedora-cloud-base.ks

[PATCH 2/3] remove the hacks in %post for extlinux

From: Dennis Gilmore Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore (cherry picked from commit bc1f075e4110c5bad913936036b335bd217f6624) --- fedora-cloud-base.ks | 12 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/fedora-cloud-base.ks b/fedora-cloud-base.ks index

Merge some F23 commits to F24 fedora-cloud-base.ks

NOTE: Please merge this to the f24 branch In F23 we added some commits to make the build work. These commits were never merged to master (rawhide) so they didn't make it to F24 when the kickstarts were created. We need these commits to make the F24 fedora-cloud-base.ks more closely match the

merge some patches from F23 for F24 fedora-cloud-base.ks

NOTE: Please apply this to the f24 branch This is a patch series to pull forward patches that were made to the f23 branch but that were never merged to the master (rawhide) branch. We need these patches to get the f24 kickstart to match closer to what we used and what was successful for f23. I

[PATCH 3/3] do not remove grub2

From: Dennis Gilmore Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore (cherry picked from commit fb40fd6d03d1f10cfbc968387877d8ef6eaaf067) --- fedora-cloud-base.ks | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fedora-cloud-base.ks b/fedora-cloud-base.ks index

[PATCH 2/3] remove the hacks in %post for extlinux

From: Dennis Gilmore Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore (cherry picked from commit bc1f075e4110c5bad913936036b335bd217f6624) --- fedora-cloud-base.ks | 12 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/fedora-cloud-base.ks b/fedora-cloud-base.ks index

Merge some F23 commits to master for fedora-cloud-base.ks

NOTE: Please merge this to the master branch In F23 we added some commits to make the build work. These commits were never merged to master (rawhide) so let's do that now. ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Path for F24 ostree vs F23 ostree

I've noticed we switched up the path to the ref for Fedora 24 vs Fedora 23 atomic. https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/atomic/23/refs/heads/fedora-atomic/f23/ https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/atomic/24/refs/heads/fedora-atomic/24/ Was this intentional?

[PATCH 1/3] switch the cloud base image to grub for Alpha

From: Dennis Gilmore Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore (cherry picked from commit 932524c849524eabe9ec8b56ed4f85396a22b0ad) --- fedora-cloud-base.ks | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fedora-cloud-base.ks b/fedora-cloud-base.ks

Re: Our FAD has been approved

On 05/05/2016 05:11 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > ... so get your travel now, if you haven't already. > Great work Josh! Dusty ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [PATCH] cloud-base-vagrant: use extlinux to match cloud-base

On 05/03/2016 11:50 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 05/03/2016 07:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >>> If we don't do this it will try to use grub2 but will fail >>> because we re

[PATCH] fedora-cloud-base: Add which package back.

After removing grub2 the which package gets removed. Let's add it back because it is generally useful and because it is needed for many vagrant utilities to work. --- fedora-cloud-base.ks | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/fedora-cloud-base.ks b/fedora-cloud-base.ks index

[PATCH] cloud-base-vagrant: use extlinux to match cloud-base

If we don't do this it will try to use grub2 but will fail because we removed the packages from the package set. --- fedora-cloud-base-vagrant.ks | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fedora-cloud-base-vagrant.ks b/fedora-cloud-base-vagrant.ks index f7f1518..855bfee

Re: [PATCH] cloud-base-vagrant: use extlinux to match cloud-base

On 05/04/2016 11:30 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:50:13PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> I had previously suggested that we go back to using grub2 (like we >> did in F23) for fedora cloud base (both base and vagrant images) but >> dgilmore/mattdm, a

Re: [X-POST] Fedora 24 Cloud/Atomic test day tomorrow

On 05/09/2016 10:30 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > Hi all, > > As we discussed in the weekly meeting, we are organizing a test day for > Fedora Cloud/Atomic images tomorrow. [1] is the event page, more details > about individual tests can be found at [2]. > > Please find some time in the to test one

Re: [X-POST] Fedora 24 Cloud/Atomic test day tomorrow

On 05/09/2016 12:28 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 05/09/2016 10:30 AM, Kushal Das wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As we discussed in the weekly meeting, we are organizing a test day for >> Fedora Cloud/Atomic images tomorrow. [1] is the event page, more details >&

Re: [PATCH] fedora-cloud-base: Add which package back.

Now that we are done building betas can I get someone to apply this patch now to both F24 and master branches. On 05/04/2016 02:15 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > After removing grub2 the which package gets removed. Let's add it back > because it is generally useful and because it is needed fo

Re: cloud Digest, Vol 76, Issue 7

Hi Manu, Can you go to this page and join the mailing list: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud.lists.fedoraproject.org/ Dusty On 04/18/2016 10:09 PM, Manu a.r. wrote: > Please add me to the list. > > > Thanks > MAnu > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:26 PM,

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 04/20/2016 04:32 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

Re: Fedora-Atomic-24-20160523.n.0.x86_64.qcow2 passes all tests

On 05/24/2016 05:20 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > Hi all, > > Tested Fedora-Atomic-24-20160523.n.0.x86_64.qcow2 [1] today on > Openstack, it passed all the defined tests in tunirtests repo. Good work > everyone on getting the bugs fixed. That's great news! How did the base cloud image go?

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 07/26/2016 04:59 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

rpm-ostree history was lost

So when we pointed the thing that makes new ostrees to the "correct" location we started a new ostree repo that knows nothing about the old ostree history. I just did an upgrade and here is what I'm looking at: [vagrant@vanilla-f24atomic ~]$ sudo rpm-ostree status TIMESTAMP (UTC)

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 08/09/2016 06:39 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 08/09/2016 06:39 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

Re: Fedora Atomic Two Week Release (Based on Fedora 24)

On 07/13/2016 09:47 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > On behalf of many various groups within the Fedora Project > including the Release Engineering and Tooling teams, Websites Team, > and Cloud Working Group I would like to announce the Fedora Atomic > Host Two Week Release now based on

Re: Fedora Atomic Two Week Release (Based on Fedora 24)

On 07/13/2016 10:26 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 07/13/2016 10:19 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> On 07/13/2016 09:47 PM, Adam Miller wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> On behalf of many various groups within the Fedora Project >>> including th

Re: Fedora Atomic Two Week Release (Based on Fedora 24)

On 07/13/2016 10:19 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 07/13/2016 09:47 PM, Adam Miller wrote: >> Hello all, >> On behalf of many various groups within the Fedora Project >> including the Release Engineering and Tooling teams, Websites Team, >> and Cloud Worki

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-07-06

summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-07-06/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-07-06-17.01.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-07-06/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-07-06-17.01.log.html == #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Cloud WG

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 02/02/2017 10:56 AM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

Re: Periodic Cloud Image Updates

On 02/03/2017 12:21 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:41:38AM -0600, Joe Doss wrote: >> I was talking on IRC with Dusty and he said this topic would be good >> for the mailing list. What would it take to get an updated cloud >> image beyond the first image that comes out

[atomic-wg] Issue #199 `Plan for Atomic prerelease images`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` sounds good to me. Others will chime in from the mailing list if they care. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/199 ___ cloud

[atomic-wg] Issue #138 `Produce updated cloud base images monthly`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` A few users have been requesting this as of late: [mail thread] (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IADTY4BL3M3YBL7QKOTYNRR54DOP6XHB/) @mattdm had some questions in [this

[atomic-wg] Issue #173 `Fedora Cloud Base Vagrant Boxes Don't Allow Vagrant User To su To Other Users`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` thanks - we'll wait and confirm the images are built and working and then close this. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/173

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >