[cloud-sig] Issue #280: new meeting time for cloud sig

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` The QA meeting is Mondays at 1500UTC. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/280 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #295: Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` +1 to the @jberkus proposal `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/295 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Proposal: Release blocking for F27

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 02:32:09PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > The concrete thing I'm trying to achieve is that bugs like > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435310 > are able to be fixed during freeze time. It's exceedingly > strange to me that we had to structure the request as

Re: 2wk atomic release candidate: 20170327

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 05:03:33PM +0200, Josh Berkus wrote: > Since I'm at Kubecon, I cannot test the ISO on bare metal this week. > Can someone else? > > -- > -- > Josh Berkus > Project Atomic > Red Hat OSAS I've installed this on bare metal and things seem to be working well. Have fun at

Re: Atomic openQA result emails ('compose check report')

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 03:23:45PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Also do let me know if running more tests on the Atomic installer image > would be desirable. For now we just run a single test - a straight- > through install test on x86_64 BIOS - since that's all I was asked for > initially.

[atomic-wg] Issue #170 `Finish new Fedora Atomic PRD`

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Updated it on the Wiki [0], closing the ticket :) Thanks everyone! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Atomic/PRD `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/170

[atomic-wg] Issue #170 `Finish new Fedora Atomic PRD`

The status of the issue: `Finish new Fedora Atomic PRD` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by roshi. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/170 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Minutes from Yesterdays Meeting 2017-02-15

=== #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Atomic WG === Meeting started by roshi at 17:00:23 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-02-15/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-02-15-17.00.log.html . Meeting

[atomic-wg] Issue #204 `Move ssh container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit `

The status of the issue: `Move ssh container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit ` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed by roshi. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/204 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #204 `Move ssh container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit `

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Decided in the meeting that we're not going to have this any longer. Closing. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/204 ___ cloud

[atomic-wg] Issue #170 `Finish new Fedora Atomic PRD`

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Roshi/QA/Atomic_PRD Some notes to discuss for the meeting: - Update Feature about Fedora Collection of packages to speak to Fedora curated containers - Review the Requirements section, I don't think

[atomic-wg] Issue #208 `Move mariadb container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I've assigned it to you :) You have to click the "Take" button on the `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/208 ___ cloud mailing

[atomic-wg] Issue #206 `Move nginx container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I'm fine with that provided the BZ#1420947 Dockerfile gets updated to meet the same specifications as far FROM being the official fedora registry and keeping the label conventions in BZ#1421605. Those come from the guidelines on the

[atomic-wg] Issue #170 `Finish new Fedora Atomic PRD`

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I'm taking a look at what was on the EtherPad, add anything I see and then throw a draft up on the wiki so we can vote tomorrow on it. Sound good? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email

[atomic-wg] Issue #170 `Finish new Fedora Cloud PRD`

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Before we hit F26 branch, we should really nail down what the Atomic PRD is and get some documentation around it. This was brought up in the last QA meeting [0]. I think it'd be really helpful for those who aren't knee deep in Atomic

[atomic-wg] Issue #222 `Move systemd-apache httpd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

The issue: `Move systemd-apache httpd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `roshi` by roshi. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/222 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #204 `Move ssh container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit `

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420925 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/204 ___ cloud mailing list

[atomic-wg] Issue #206 `Move nginx container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Container Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420947 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/206 ___ cloud

[atomic-wg] Issue #204 `Move ssh container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit `

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Ignore that PR, source is here: https://roshi.fedorapeople.org/containers/ssh `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/204 ___ cloud

[atomic-wg] Issue #206 `Move nginx container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Source located here: https://roshi.fedorapeople.org/containers/nginx/ `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/206 ___ cloud mailing list

[atomic-wg] Issue #206 `Move nginx container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

The issue: `Move nginx container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `roshi` by roshi. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/206 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[atomic-wg] Issue #204 `Move ssh container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit `

roshi added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I'll take this one. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/204 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: [atomic-wg] Issue #138 `Produce updated cloud base images monthly`

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 06:20:09PM +, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: > `` > A few users have been requesting this as of late: [mail thread] >

Re: Fedora Atomic 2wk: Release Candidate

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:03:01AM -0500, Mike Ruckman wrote: > > I'll run some tests on this and report back. > > -- > // Mike > -- > Fedora QA > freenode: roshi > http://roshi.fedorapeople.org The results of the upstream tests [0] are up on fpaste [1]. Total

Re: Fedora Atomic 2wk: Release Candidate

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:32:02AM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > New build just finished with new kernel and new kubernetes versions that > prevented us from releasing our 2wk release last week. > > The vm images are here: > >

Re: About the recent failures of Atomic images on Autocloud

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:48:20AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Someone was actually asking me yesterday about a bug where they > couldn't ssh into a freshly-booted system for several minutes. Wonder > if it might possibly be the same thing... > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community

Re: About the recent failures of Atomic images on Autocloud

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:05:41AM +0530, Kushal Das wrote: > Finally managed to isolate the issue. If we boot the image with only one > CPU, the error comes up. If we boot with 2 or more CPU(s), no issues at > all. Now the question is if we should make local testing on Autocloud > with 2 CPU(s)

Re: Fedora Atomic WG Workflow Proposal

On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:50:03 -0600 Adam Miller wrote: > > Cards created should be units of work that can feasibly be > accomplished in a day or less worth of work. > > I would like to ultimately propose we move to a more iterative cycle > where we use this

Re: [atomic-devel] Please test new docker version with CVE

On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:59:01 -0500 Dusty Mabe wrote: > On 01/12/2017 08:40 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 11:11:42PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-dbc2b618eb > > > > Also, I will buy a beer or

Hiatus

Greetings list! I wanted to give a heads up to the list that due to some personal stuff, I will be taking a hiatus from my regularly scheduled activities. I'll still be filing test results and sporadically responding to emails - but you won't be likely to find me in our usual meetings and

Re: Cloud deliverables for F23

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:40:54PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Can someone in the Cloud WG please respond here? > > It seems surprising not to see the list of AMIs in this list, for > instance, but there are probably other deliverables that need to be > here. > > -- > Paul W. Frields

Rescheduling this weeks Blocker review meeting

. Does this Thursday (2015-08-20) at 16:00 UTC work for people? If there's a better time, please respond to the test list and we can find a better window to run the review. Thanks! Mike Ruckman ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https

2015-07-01 Cloud WG Meeting Minutes

=== #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Cloud SIG === Meeting started by kushal at 17:00:25 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-07-01/fedora-meeting-1.2015-07-01-17.00.log.html .

PRD Update (Review needed)

Hey fellow cloudies! I've updated the PRD [0] with the discussion points from the Talk [1] page. I think I got everything in there where people had it in mind. Please take a look at the PRD and edit it or leave more feedback on the Talk page. The Council is wanting this submitted for their

Re: [Cloud WG] meeting time change request

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 07:46:51PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:54:56PM +0200, Ha??kel wrote: Hi, I request that we change the meeting time to 5PM UTC. It should be fine for most of us, and we can't keep that current schedule. Please vote in that thread

2015-04-08 @ 1900 UTC ** Cloud WG Meeting Minutes

=== #fedora-meeting-1: Cloud WG === Meeting started by roshi at 18:59:59 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-04-08/cloud_wg.2015-04-08-18.59.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Roll

Just a note

Hey fellow cloudies! Just wanted to give you all a heads up that starting next week I'm going to be out of the office for a while - so you'll see me less on IRC and for meetings. I'll still be monitoring email and IRC though, so if you have something for me I'll still get to it :) Thanks! -- //

2015-04-06 @ 1600 UTC ** F22 Blocker Review Meeting

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-04-06 # Time: 1700 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! Tomorrow we'll be having another blocker review directly after the QA meeting. Currently we have 7 proposed blockers for Beta and none proposed for Final. If

2015-03-30 @ 1600 UTC ** Fedora 22 Blocker Review

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-03-30 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Well, this email is going out a bit late, but I'm sure you all know it's that time of the week again! We've had a few more proposals since our meeting last week. We currently

dnf migration period

Greetings fellow cloudies! This bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201655) spawned a conversation on IRC that we thought should be moved here to the list. With the migration from yum to dnf in full swing, we've got to figure out what the intent translates to regarding packages

2015-03-16 @ 1600 UTC ** Fedora Blocker Review

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-03-16 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's coming up to that time of the week again: Blocker Review! Currently we have 5/1 proposed blockers for Beta and Final. Again, we're meeting at 1600 UTC right after the QA

2015-03-11 @ 1900 UTC ** Cloud WG Meeting Minutes

= #fedora-meeting-1 Meeting = Meeting started by roshi at 19:04:18 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-03-11/cloud_wg.2015-03-11-19.04.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Roll Call

2015-03-09 @ 1600 UTC ** NOTE NEW TIME ** Fedora Blocker Review Meeting

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-03-90 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Well, Alpha is set to head out into the wild and that means that now we've got to start checking in on the Beta release! We've got 2 blocker proposals for Beta to check out and

Results of Go/No-Go meeting

Hey fellow cloud folks, it was decided at today's Go/No-Go meeting [0] that we're not ready for Alpha release. RC1 proposal is in and should finish sometime in the next 8 or so hours - then we'll commence testing (for some of us, over night) in order to re-evaluate where we are for another

Re: Dockerfile promo post

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Plan to post tomorrow. Anything to add/change here? Sorry for the delay! http://fpaste.org/192977/ -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb |

2015-03-02 @ 1700 UTC ** Fedora 22 Blocker Review Meeting

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-03-02 # Time: 1700 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Another week and a couple TCs later, it's time for some blocker review goodness! Also, as an added bonus, Alpha Freeze is upon us so we get to look over FE bugs as well.

2015-02-23 @ 1700 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-02-23 # Time: 1700 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's that time of the week again! After another week of testing we have 4 proposed Alpha blockers and 2 proposed for final. If you want to take a look at the proposed or

Re: 2015-02-08 @ 1700 UTC ** F22 Blocker Review Meeting WRONG

DAY Reply-To: In-Reply-To: 20150206155432.gi27...@redwood.ruck.lan On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 08:54:32AM -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote: # F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-02-08 # Time: 1700 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net So far this week we've found 1 proposed

2015-02-04 @ 1900 UTC ** Cloud SIG Meeting Minutes

=== #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Cloud SIG === Meeting started by roshi at 19:17:28 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-02-04/cloud_sig.2015-02-04-19.17.log.html . Meeting summary

2015-01-12 @ 1700 UTC ** Fedora Blocker Review **NEW TIME**

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-01-12 # Time: 1700 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's that time of week again, time for some Blocker Review! While it might seem like I've lost track of what day it is again (which happens, I admit), we discussed it this week

Re: Couple of issues - link in wiki page incorrect AMI IDs

On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 02:14:55PM +0100, Richard Fearn wrote: Hi, This page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud has a link to here: http://cloud.fedoraproject.org/ but that page is outdated and redirects to https://getfedora.org/. It might be better to link directly to the

Re: current shell's bash history lost on reboot

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:02:37AM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: The other day during the Atomic Test Day jzb and I noticed that we were losing bash history (seemingly randomly). Today I dug into it a bit more. If you reboot a machine from a bash session then you will lose all of your history

2014-12-03 Cloud WG Meeting Minutes

=== #fedora-meeting-1: Cloud WG === Meeting started by roshi at 19:06:00 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-12-03/cloud_wg.2014-12-03-19.06.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Roll

Re: Release Announcement

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:09:08PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Hey all, Is there anything we're missing here? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F21_Final_release_announcement I feel like we need a little more spicy on the cloud stuff, but not quite sure what. Thoughts? Best, jzb --

Re: Meeting tomorrow - will we have a quorum?

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:48:33AM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Hey all, Past experience suggests that a lot of people fade out for vacation in the U.S. early in the week. Wondering if we'll have a quorum (or anybody) around for a meeting tomorrow? (I've pinged a few folks on IRC and

2014-11-26 @ 1600 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting

# F21 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2014-11-26 # Time: 16:00 UTC (run date -d '2014-11-26 16:00 UTC' to see local time) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net While we just had a out of band blocker review today after the QA meeting, we'll still be having our regularly scheduled

Re: Please karma https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpm-ostree-2014.111-1.fc21

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 06:27:50AM +0100, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Not sure the formalized plans are much different? (Roshi?) You can feel free to copy this over to the Test Day page if you like, or I can later today. snip -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst

Re: Please karma https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpm-ostree-2014.111-1.fc21

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:25:53PM +0100, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On 11/18/2014 05:24 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: We don't do much with the formalized test plans but we do need to take those steps and put them into test cases for Atomic. I'll work on that today so we have what we need

2014-11-19 @ 1600 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting

# F21 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2014-11-19 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's that time of the week again! Things have been moving along smoothly after the Beta release - and now Freeze is upon us for final. This means we'll

Cloud Providers Criteria Discussion

Hey all, Back in late October we agreed that not having AMIs uploaded was something we should block on [0], but I felt like the must boot criteria didn't really fit. I proposed to the cloud WG [1] a new criteria: Cloud images must be available in the following supported service registries:

Re: Update: Fedora Atomic Test Day

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:36:30PM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Hey all, So - the good news is that we are tantalizingly close[1] to a good build for the Atomic image. (We're missing the docker-storage-setup package, and I think it's missing the config to pull in updates using atomic

Re: 32 bit AMI registration boot problem: explaination and possible solutions

On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 07:25:28PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: I would love to get rid of the 32bit AMIs. That being said, is this a knee jerk reaction? Typically it's best to make changes like this with planning involved and sufficient notice of the change so the community can prepare.

Re: New Meeting Time

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:09:04PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: OK. It looks like I have some people ok with Thursday at 16:00 UTC and some people OK with Wednesday at 19:00 UTC. My current proposal is Wednesday at 19:00 UTC. Please +1/-1 this proposal and we will set the new meeting time.

Re: New Meeting Time

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 07:27:49AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On 10/22/2014 05:51 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: What does everyone think about Thursday at 16:00 UTC? scollier, you are the only one that is listed as not available during that time. Can you somehow make it? I think this works,

2014-10-22 @ 1600 UTC ** Fedora 21 Blocker Review Meeting

# F21 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2014-10-22 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net We've already had one blocker review meeting this week (which is likely why I forgot to send this email until now), but it's time for another! With

Re: New Meeting Time

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 05:51:32PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: Hey All, Sorry this took so long. I was trying to get Dennis to vote so that we could accommodate his schedule if we ever needed him in any meetings. I never heard back from him so I'm moving forward. The results are here:

Re: reconsider cloud environment in anaconda ui for f21

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 07:31:33AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: Right now, Cloud is the default environment in the Anaconda UI. This is clearly not right, and there's an urgent ticket to do Something Else. (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1358) I know there was general agreement

Re: [X-POST] Script to convert Fedora Cloud instance to Fedora Server instance

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:49:31AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:21:19AM +0200, Haïkel wrote: 1. there were some discussions about dropping Python from the base cloud image. The rationale was to get the smallest viable image for most usage, not everyone uses

2014-10-15 @ 16:00 UTC ** F21 Blocker Review Meeting

# F21 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2014-10-15 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net As testing of Beta TC3 continues, it's time for another blocker review meeting. Currently we have 3 proposed blockers and 2 proposed FEs. We have 10

Re: [DRAFT] Changes to Working Group structure

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:00:27AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: # # # Thoughts, comments, flames? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ I don't know if the new

Re: Regrets for Friday's meeting

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:51:54PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Hey all, A little early, but I'm going to be out of office Friday and won't be able to make the meeting. If someone can chair, I'll try to make sure the agenda is updated and will send along my notes/report before then.

Re: Cloud Test Overview

On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:57:43PM +0200, milanisko k wrote: Guys, are the Cloud Image news being published on the Fedmsg channels? I'd like to investigate integration of RedHatQE's test runner and suite https://github.com/RedHatQE/dva. Thanks, milan Milan, Currently fedimg has

Re: Cloud Test Overview

On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 10:03:00AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On 10/02/2014 08:01 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote: Hey fellow fedorans! I've made some slight edits to the existing Test Overview [0] on the wiki and would like some feedback. It's meant as a high-level overview of all

Re: Proposed Cloud release criteria for F21

On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 05:54:42PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: snip We kind of already have this, really, in that we don't *explicitly* say that all the requirements about desktop stuff don't apply to non-desktop installs, but everyone just understands it. We could add some fairly short

Cloud Test Overview

Hey fellow fedorans! I've made some slight edits to the existing Test Overview [0] on the wiki and would like some feedback. It's meant as a high-level overview of all the things we think we need to test for the Fedora 21 cloud product. It's not intended to be an exhaustive list, just a basic

2014-10-03 @ 16:00 UTC ** Out of band Blocker Review Meeting

# F21 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2014-10-03 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Towards the end of today's blocker review meeting, we decided it would be good for us to have a another meeting this week to deal with the unusually

Re: Cloud WG proposed new slate [was: cloud wg official membership refresh?]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:38:36PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On 09/29/2014 09:16 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: Okay, so, I went through the IRC logs, e-mail archives, https://github.com/fedora-cloud/, and tickets. I identified this last of the the most active cloud SIG members, and I think

2014-10-01 @ 16:00 UTC ** Fedora Blocker Review Meeting

# F21 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2014-10-01 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's that time of the week again! Currently there are 14 bugs that need some TLC. Happily, that's 11 less than there were last week, so we might stand a

Cloud SIG Meeting Minutes

=== #fedora-meeting Meeting === Meeting started by roshi at 17:03:09 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-09-26/cloud_sig.2014-09-26-17.03.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Roll Call (roshi,

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Haïkel wrote: Hello guys, I have been testing the base atomic images on openstack, so far, so good ! I'll do later libvirt. From last meeting, I understand that jsmith will be handling the testing on AWS. Few things: * matrix has not been

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Haïkel wrote: Hello guys, I have been testing the base atomic images on openstack, so far, so good ! I'll do later libvirt. From last meeting, I understand that jsmith will be handling the testing on AWS. Few things: * matrix has not been

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:00:58PM +0200, Haïkel wrote: 2014-09-17 19:05 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com: As a release blocker for Alpha or final? Both, as alpha release requirements are much less restrictive but I'm open on the alpha side. I don't want to block the alpha

2014-09-17 @ ** 16:00 UTC ** - F21 Blocker Review

# F21 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2014-09-17 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Greeting testers! Tomorrow we've got another Blocker Review to do. As of today there are no proposed blockers and 6 proposed FEs for F21 Alpha. The

2014-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC ** F21 Blocker Review

# F21 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2014-09-10 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's everyones favorite time of the week! Our next blocker review meeting will be this Wednesday (as usual). As of right now, we have 2 proposed

2014-08-27 @ 16:00 UTC ** F21 Blocker Review

# F21 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2014-08-27 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's time again tomorrow for another blocker review meeting! Currently there are 4 proposed blockers, but more can certainly be

2014-08-06 @ 16:00 UTC ** F21 Blocker Review #5

# F21 Blocker Review meeting #5 # Date: 2014-08-06 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's that time of the week again - more blocker review goodness. With flock going on, I don't know if there will be enough people to have a meeting -

2014-07-23 @ ** 16:00 UTC ** - F21 Blocker Review #4

# F21 Blocker Review meeting #4 # Date: 2014-07-30 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net We've got another blocker meeting coming up this week. As of today there are 2 proposed blockers and 1 proposed FE for F21 Alpha (same as last week).

Re: 2014-07-23 @ ** 16:00 UTC ** - F21 Blocker Review #4

On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:50:57 -0600 Mike Ruckman ro...@fedoraproject.org wrote: # F21 Blocker Review meeting #4 # Date: 2014-07-30 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net We've got another blocker meeting coming up this week

2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1

# F21 Blocker Review meeting #1 # Date: 2014-07-09 # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Well folks, it's that time again. Throughout the planning process for Fedora.next, we've been able to identify some potential blockers and we should

Re: Meeting Time?

On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:10:28 -0500 Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote: Hey all, So - we have a meeting scheduled tomorrow at 9 a.m. Central (or 14:00:00 to 15:00:00 UTC for those of you not fortunate enough to live in St. Louis...). I'm concerned about the timing because: - It's the

Re: Taking a break or whatever - action needed, I guess

On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:19:04 +0900 Sandro \red\ Mathys r...@fedoraproject.org wrote: TL;DR: my tasks/changes need new (co-)owners and I offer to free my WG seat Things (in terms of my contributions to Fedora / the Cloud SIG) looked really great in 2014Q1 and there was no reason to assume Q2

Re: WORKING rawhide cloud image -- let's get it in shape for alpha

On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:53:55 -0400 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: This one boots and works! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7078357 On my very first test, I couldn't ssh in after boot even though the instance was up in openstack. That's a little

Cloud Testing

Greetings, Cloud list! I've been looking through the QA tasks we have for cloud and had some questions. I'm searching for some tests we currently run against cloud images and I haven't been able to find much. While we have two test cases on the Installation portion of the Release Validation

Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues

On Tue, 27 May 2014 18:22:21 -0700 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, folks. So continuing with the theme of setting up the Fedora.next QA process, I thought before going too far with draft release criteria etc, we could discuss a couple of important points that have come up since