Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro
> > > > There is some history behind that. There is a bug report for it here: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860 > > Well sort of, it explains where the source for the package is coming from but > it doesn't really help me understand whether I should trust the package > versioning (1.1.0) or the versioning the packaged code reports (1.0.6) in It's really 1.0.6, and yes, it's really confusing. Jason ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro
- Original Message -
> From: "Dusty Mabe" <du...@dustymabe.com>
> To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> On 03/13/2016 03:04 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >
> >> From: "Kai Qiang Wu" <wk...@cn.ibm.com>
> >> To: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: "Ton Ngo" <t...@us.ibm.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 5:07:17 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting
> >> single/multiple OS distro
> >
> >> Hi Steve，
> >> I think what you did is rpm version, here is my finding:
> >
> >> [minion@k8-pdvmggl3ys-0-cdruybssooyh-kube-master-vtartl7oubyc ~]$ rpm -qa
> >> |
> >> grep kubernetes
> >> kubernetes-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> >> kubernetes-node-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> >> kubernetes-client-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> >> kubernetes-master-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> >> [minion@k8-pdvmggl3ys-0-cdruybssooyh-kube-master-vtartl7oubyc ~]$ kubectl
> >> version
> >> Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"0", GitVersion:"v1.0.6",
> >> GitCommit:"388061f00f0d9e4d641f9ed4971c775e1654579d GitTreeState:"clean"}
> >> Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"0", GitVersion:"v1.0.6",
> >> GitCommit:"388061f00f0d9e4d641f9ed4971c775e1654579d GitTreeState:"clean"}
> >
> >> It seems we should trust kubectl version, it is final version, it said
> >> v1.0.6.
> >
> > Adding cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org. Folks, can you explain the reason for
> > the discrepancy between the packages that appear to have been used to
> > build the image and the tools themselves? Specifically looking at
> > Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-23-20160308.x86_64.qcow2
>
> There is some history behind that. There is a bug report for it here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860
Well sort of, it explains where the source for the package is coming from but
it doesn't really help me understand whether I should trust the package
versioning (1.1.0) or the versioning the packaged code reports (1.0.6) in the
current image? The blog post linked in the bug also just glosses over this by
reporting the package versions:
http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/12/fedora-atomic-host-two-week-release-ready/
From this one would make the same assumption I did - that it's 1.1.0, but is it
actually?
> The good news is that if you test out the kube 1.2 that is in updates testing
> and
> give it some karma we might be able to release close to the same time that
> kubernetes
> upstream releases 1.2:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a89f5ce5f4
This does at least appear to report correctly as 1.2.0:
$ kubectl version
Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"2", GitVersion:"v1.2.0",
GitCommit:"cffae0523cfa80ddf917aba69f08508b91f603d5", GitTreeState:"clean"}
Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"2", GitVersion:"v1.2.0",
GitCommit:"cffae0523cfa80ddf917aba69f08508b91f603d5", GitTreeState:"clean"}
Which still leaves me wondering what is to be trusted when it comes to the
version in the current image?
-Steve
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro
On 03/13/2016 03:04 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
>> From: "Kai Qiang Wu" <wk...@cn.ibm.com>
>> To: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Ton Ngo" <t...@us.ibm.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 5:07:17 AM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting
>> single/multiple OS distro
>
>> Hi Steve，
>> I think what you did is rpm version, here is my finding:
>
>> [minion@k8-pdvmggl3ys-0-cdruybssooyh-kube-master-vtartl7oubyc ~]$ rpm -qa |
>> grep kubernetes
>> kubernetes-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
>> kubernetes-node-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
>> kubernetes-client-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
>> kubernetes-master-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
>> [minion@k8-pdvmggl3ys-0-cdruybssooyh-kube-master-vtartl7oubyc ~]$ kubectl
>> version
>> Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"0", GitVersion:"v1.0.6",
>> GitCommit:"388061f00f0d9e4d641f9ed4971c775e1654579d GitTreeState:"clean"}
>> Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"0", GitVersion:"v1.0.6",
>> GitCommit:"388061f00f0d9e4d641f9ed4971c775e1654579d GitTreeState:"clean"}
>
>> It seems we should trust kubectl version, it is final version, it said
>> v1.0.6.
>
> Adding cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org. Folks, can you explain the reason for
> the discrepancy between the packages that appear to have been used to build
> the image and the tools themselves? Specifically looking at
> Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-23-20160308.x86_64.qcow2
There is some history behind that. There is a bug report for it here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860
The good news is that if you test out the kube 1.2 that is in updates testing
and
give it some karma we might be able to release close to the same time that
kubernetes
upstream releases 1.2:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a89f5ce5f4
- Dusty
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro
- Original Message -
> From: "Kai Qiang Wu" <wk...@cn.ibm.com>
> To: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Ton Ngo" <t...@us.ibm.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 5:07:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting
> single/multiple OS distro
> Hi Steve，
> I think what you did is rpm version, here is my finding:
> [minion@k8-pdvmggl3ys-0-cdruybssooyh-kube-master-vtartl7oubyc ~]$ rpm -qa |
> grep kubernetes
> kubernetes-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> kubernetes-node-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> kubernetes-client-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> kubernetes-master-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> [minion@k8-pdvmggl3ys-0-cdruybssooyh-kube-master-vtartl7oubyc ~]$ kubectl
> version
> Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"0", GitVersion:"v1.0.6",
> GitCommit:"388061f00f0d9e4d641f9ed4971c775e1654579d GitTreeState:"clean"}
> Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"0", GitVersion:"v1.0.6",
> GitCommit:"388061f00f0d9e4d641f9ed4971c775e1654579d GitTreeState:"clean"}
> It seems we should trust kubectl version, it is final version, it said
> v1.0.6.
Adding cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org. Folks, can you explain the reason for the
discrepancy between the packages that appear to have been used to build the
image and the tools themselves? Specifically looking at
Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-23-20160308.x86_64.qcow2
Thanks,
Steve
> Thanks
> Best Wishes,
>
> Kai Qiang Wu (吴开强 Kennan）
> IBM China System and Technology Lab, Beijing
> E-mail: wk...@cn.ibm.com
> Tel: 86-10-82451647
> Address: Building 28(Ring Building), ZhongGuanCun Software Park,
> No.8 Dong Bei Wang West Road, Haidian District Beijing P.R.China 100193
>
> Follow your heart. You are miracle!
> Steve Gordon ---12/03/2016 12:46:50 am-------- Original Message ----- > From:
> "Kai Qiang Wu" <wk...@cn.ibm.com>
> From: Steve Gordon <sgor...@redhat.com>
> To: Kai Qiang Wu/China/IBM@IBMCN
> Cc: Ton Ngo <t...@us.ibm.com>
> Date: 12/03/2016 12:46 am
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting
> single/multiple OS distro
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Kai Qiang Wu" <wk...@cn.ibm.com>
> > To: "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Ton Ngo" <t...@us.ibm.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:58:04 AM
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting
> > single/multiple OS distro
> > Hi Steve，
> > I tried the link you gave me
> > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html
> > and download the atomic 23 image,
> > And deploy with Magnum, and login in server, and found it is still
> > GitVersion: V1.0.6
> > Could you confirm is it v1.1.0 ? From my test, I did not find it such case.
> I am simply loading the image up in virt-manager:
> $ sudo qemu-img create -f qcow2 -o preallocation=metadata
> /var/lib/libvirt/images/Test-Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-23-20160308.x86_64.qcow2
> 50G
> $ sudo virt-resize --expand /dev/vda1
> /home/sgordon/Downloads/Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-23-20160308.x86_64.qcow2
> /var/lib/libvirt/images/Test-Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-23-20160308.x86_64.qcow2
> ...create new VM from disk image in virt-manager and attach init.iso CD-ROM
> with metadata, ssh in...
> $ cat /etc/redhat-release
> Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three)
> $ rpm -qa | grep kubernetes
> kubernetes-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> kubernetes-node-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> kubernetes-client-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> kubernetes-master-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
> Are you sure Magnum isn't modifying it?
> -Steve
> > Thanks
> > Best Wishes,
> >
> > Kai Qiang Wu (吴开强 Kennan）
> > IBM China System and Technology Lab, Beijing
> > E-mail: wk...@cn.ibm.com
> > Tel: 86-10-82451647
> > Address: Building 28(Ring Building), ZhongGuanCun Software Park,
> > No.8 Dong Bei Wang West Road, Haidian District Beijing P.R.China 100193
> >
> > Follow your heart. You are miracle!
> > Steve Gordon ---11/03/2016 10:46:06 am Original Message - >
> > From:
> > "Kai Qiang Wu" <wk...@cn.ibm.com>
> > From: Steve Gordon <sgor...@redhat.com>
>
