jlebon commented on the pull-request: `post: Re-instate systemd
ProtectHome/ProtectSystem and PrivateTmp` that you are following:
``
Huh, weird. It's on the cloud list at least:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ABP32B6H3Z25R77A4PZIT56TKV2DC2IU/.
walters commented on the pull-request: `post: Re-instate systemd
ProtectHome/ProtectSystem and PrivateTmp` that you are following:
``
Cherry pick from master. To be merged right after the next F26AH release.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
walters opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you
are following:
``
post: Re-instate systemd ProtectHome/ProtectSystem and PrivateTmp
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/79
jlebon merged a pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
post: Re-instate systemd ProtectHome/ProtectSystem and PrivateTmp
``
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/79
___
cloud mailing
walters commented on the pull-request: `post: Re-instate systemd
ProtectHome/ProtectSystem and PrivateTmp` that you are following:
``
I think I got confused since I thought I saw a release but now I can't find it
in my email.I don't see it on
jlebon commented on the pull-request: `post: Re-instate systemd
ProtectHome/ProtectSystem and PrivateTmp` that you are following:
``
Just to be sure, you meant the release that already went out today or in the
next one in two weeks? Seems like it should be safe to merge now.
``
To reply, visit
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree commit:
Commit: 13ed0f241c9945fd5253689ccd081b5478e5841a71909020e719437bbeb74424
Version: 26.110
Existing systems can be upgraded in place via e.g. `atomic host upgrade` or
`atomic host deploy`.
Corresponding image media for new