Fedora 18 Feature: OpenShift Origin might slip

Hello all, I had found some volunteers last Friday to review the rest of the packages needed for our feature for Fedora 18 but it would appear they didn't come through and I haven't been able to reach them online today so I'm *really* hoping some folks have spare cycles and I can beg them for

Re: Cloud SIG grou Todo list

On Jan 27, 2014 8:58 PM, Frankie Onuonga frankie.onuo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This might be totally out of topic here to some extent, but I felt like I had to ask. In the document(Virtual paper) I see you have mentioned building images for open shift. Should we put general PAAS so we can

Re: Atomic 2 week releases

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Michael P. McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: Hey all, I wanted to start a thread about doing more frequent Atomic releases in Fedora. In particular I'd like to start building a new atomic release every two weeks that includes the latest version of Docker,

Re: Atomic 2 week releases

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/10/2015 02:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: So, I'm wondering if for F22 (or F23, if we feel like that ship is out in the harbor losing sight of land already), we want to do one of two things: A. Move Atomic out of the

Re: basic plan for two-week atomic images

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Adam Miller maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Michael P. McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent

Re: basic plan for two-week atomic images

images On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:37:18AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: 2. Images built from those nightly (I think right now only rawhide?) once f22 is final only rawhide. What would it take to make those happen post-release? If we could get a clearly defined list of what these items are I

Re: basic plan for two-week atomic images

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Adam Miller maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:14:51PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: 1. F22 trees built nightly (already happening) there is new

Re: basic plan for two-week atomic images

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:11:51AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: I, for one, care a lot - but have been buried. Sorry. Yeah, ditto. There was this whole F22 release thing that happened. :) Totally understandable,

Re: basic plan for two-week atomic images

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:14:51PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: 1. F22 trees built nightly (already happening) there is new atomic trees built as part of the package updates process managed by bodhi. Cool. 2.

Re: Alternatives to cloud-init (was Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud and Server Workgroup relationship)

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Michael McGrath wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>> On 10/28/2015 08:21 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: The *could*

Re: Functional Requirements for Layered Image Build Service

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jay Greguske <jgreg...@redhat.com> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/28/2015 12:16 PM, Adam Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Matthew Miller >> <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote

Re: Alternatives to cloud-init (was Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud and Server Workgroup relationship)

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Adam Miller <maxamill...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2015 10:36, "Joe Brockmeier" <j...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 11/03/2015 11:24 AM, Adam Miller wrote: >> > I've been a fan of testcloud for this use

Re: Alternatives to cloud-init (was Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud and Server Workgroup relationship)

On Nov 3, 2015 10:36, "Joe Brockmeier" <j...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 11/03/2015 11:24 AM, Adam Miller wrote: > > I've been a fan of testcloud for this use case because I'm of the > > opinion that vagrant is overkill when all I want to do is boot a cloud > &g

Re: Alternatives to cloud-init (was Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud and Server Workgroup relationship)

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 04:28 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> Is that the same as this procedure [1]? Or else can you point at the details? >> >> [1] http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2014/10/getting-started-with-cloud-init/

Re: Image Building Documentation

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote: > <3 You're my hero! :) > > (Still. Yes, still. One of many. But seriously: THANK YOU!) > > -robyn > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Jay Greguske wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: Becoming comaintainer for Fedora-Dockerfiles

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > - Original Message - >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: >> > - Original Message - >> >> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:00:43AM -0500, Scott Collier wrote: >> >> >

Re: atomic, kubernetes, etc on non x86_64

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: Hi all, Last night I had some time to myself, I decided to look at what it would take to get atomic running on arm. after having to tweak some of the json files. the hardcoded ref in it if not flexible at all -ref:

Re: atomic builds still broken

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> Is that the problem that is breaking the builds? How do we get the >> location updated? > > Indeed, the TDL file is broken. I believe for Koji -> ImageFactory, >

Re: Two-Week Atomic actual deliverables

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:02:10PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> * Vagrant boxes: >> - same tunir-based test suite in VM environemnt > > Followup! Kushal points out that we are testing the KVM vagrant images >

Re: Two-Week Atomic actual deliverables

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Adam Miller > <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> I'm pretty neutral on B or C. I don't really care and also don't think it >> should e

Re: Mo's proposed fedora atomic logo

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > https://mattdm.fedorapeople.org/misc/newfedoratomiclogomockup.png > > With Fedora Atomic Host as primary, the current Fedora Cloud logo would > be still used for the Cloud Base image, but would probably be >

Re: Two-Week Atomic actual deliverables

ra QA including > manual testing) plus updates (which haven't) > - used to generate all images above, so basic function is verified > - however, not actually tested to boot on non-VM hardware, for UI > problems, etc. > > > In talking with some of the people doing the ac

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Adam Miller > <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be >> downloaded at: >&g

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be downloaded at: https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:

Re: Putting Networkd on cloud Atomic and base image for F24

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 12/14/2015 03:23 PM, Kushal Das wrote: >> The third choice is already in the images along with systemd. We are >> talking about enabling it as default networking stack. Ubuntu already >> has a beta implementation in

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be downloaded at: https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:

Re: proposal: add a small set of default labels to the docker base images

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > I'd like to propose that a small subset of LABEL values be added to the > Dockerfile, to support the generic labels defined here -> > https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels > > I think adding

Re: Fedora 23 Cloud Atomic Developer Mode Preview

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Jonathan Lebon wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As some of you may already know, I've been working on adding >> a new feature to the Fedora 23 Cloud Atomic image called >> "Developer Mode" (I'm

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: > > > On 12/22/2015 10:41 AM, Adam Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/15/2015 05:20 PM, Adam

Re: [atomic-devel] Need owner of Atomic 2 Week releases

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > >> On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Amanda Carter wrote: >>> Hey folks, creating a separate thread for this longer

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:20 PM, wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html Please note that we've had reports that a

Re: No Fedora 24 container?

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 09:43:26PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >> https://hub.docker.com/_/fedora/ >> This seems like a big loss, especially for getting folks to test Fedora 24. > > Previously, it's been uploaded on

Re: Fedora 24 Based Two-Week Atomic Release Delayed - Feedback Requested

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/21/2016 09:21 AM, Adam Miller wrote: >> We can slip the Fedora 24 Based Two-Week Atomic Release by 1 week just >> as the Fedora 24 GA Release was slipped and target next Tuesday >> (201

RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

Hello all, Hot off the heels of Fedora Cloud WG (well kind of ... little lag time in there) I took an action item during the Cloud WG Weekly Meeting to write up a proposal for the Fedora Council on what was being called "Project Foosion" during the Cloud FAD. In an attempt to both not get into

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora 24 Based Two-Week Atomic Release Delayed - Feedback Requested

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Jason Brooks <jbro...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Adam Miller > <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> Hello all, >> The original schedule for today's Fedora Two-Week Atomic Release >> was goi

Re: No Fedora 24 container?

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Jan Pazdziora <jpazdzi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:28:32AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: >> >> My main concern is that we would then introduce a concept of "next" >> that isn't well defined with

Re: No Fedora 24 container?

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Adam Miller > <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> My main concern is that we would then introduce a concept of "next" >> that isn't wel

Future Automated Testing for Fedora Cloud

Hello all, There has been some discussions happening as of late around the topic of Fedora QA and Fedora Cloud. Currently Fedora Cloud testing mechanisms are a not directly in line with that of the Fedora QA Team. It was discussed back at Flock that we would like to work towards bringing the

Announcement: Fedora Atomic Two-Week Release Delayed

Hello all, There are currently issues from the Rel-Eng side of the Two-Week Release. The composes of the Atomic Nightly are broken at the moment, the builds and automated testing are succeeding but the component of the compose tools that are used to bring all the content back together in a

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

Subject: Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement >> >> >> >> On 02/12/2016 01:08 PM, Adam Miller wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:35 AM, <nore...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Ho

Re: [urgent] Review container packager guidelines

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:54:20PM +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: >> >> mentions "But we

Fedora Atomic Two Week Delayed

Hello all, There is currently an issue with Fedora composes because of an unexpected change to the dnf API which has broken lorax[0], we are currently waiting for this to land in stable[1] and will get a release out after that. This kind of failure is something we don't currently handle

Re: Automating updates to apps.openstack.org to point to new Fedora Cloud Image releases?

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: > Hi folks, > > As some of you might know there is an application catalog for OpenStack at > apps.openstack.org. "Applications" on this site are thus far distributed as > Murano packages, Heat templates, and (most relevant

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Colin Walters wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, at 04:59 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: >>> >>> A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 08/09/2016 04:11 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> On 08/09/2016 06:39 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: >>> >>> A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be >>> downloaded at: >>> >>> Images can

Fedora Atomic Two Week Release (Based on Fedora 24)

Hello all, On behalf of many various groups within the Fedora Project including the Release Engineering and Tooling teams, Websites Team, and Cloud Working Group I would like to announce the Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release now based on Fedora 24 and powered by an all new Compose process

Re: RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Adam Miller <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hello all, > Hot off the heels of Fedora Cloud WG (well kind of ... little lag > time in there) I took an action item during the Cloud WG Weekly > Meeting to write up a proposal for the Fedo

[atomic-wg] Issue #201 `Planning for the first Atomic VFAD`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Following along with the [proposal that reached general consensus on the mailing

[atomic-wg] Issue #200 `Planning for interim container releases: To rebuild or not rebuild?`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` The upstream OSBS development group has had to push out the deadlines for the automated rebuild work and Factory 2.0 isn't ready yet (it wasn't planned to be, but it is noted for posterity) which means

[atomic-wg] Issue #202 `Syncing released Fedora container images to Docker Hub`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Currently the plan is to sync all container images from Fedora's Registry to the Docker Hub. Do we want to do this under the current [fedora namespace](https://hub.docker.com/u/fedora/) or create a new

[atomic-wg] Issue #200 `Planning for interim container releases: To rebuild or not rebuild?`

maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > We should do what's needed to ensure that our images pick up the most recent > rpms -- when you say rebuild all content, do you mean rebuild the rpms > themselves, or rebuild all the images? Sorry for lack of clarification, I

[atomic-wg] Issue #203 `Move apache httpd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/apache `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/203

[atomic-wg] Issue #205 `Move memcached container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit `

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/memcached `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/205

[atomic-wg] Issue #206 `Move nginx container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/nginx `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/206

[atomic-wg] Issue #215 `Move redis httpd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/redis `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/215

[atomic-wg] Issue #222 `Move systemd-apache httpd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/systemd/apache `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/222

[atomic-wg] Issue #204 `Move ssh container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit `

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/ssh `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/204

[atomic-wg] Issue #211 `Move rabbitmq container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/rabbitmq `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/211

[atomic-wg] Issue #210 `Move systemd-systemd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/systemd/systemd `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/210

[atomic-wg] Issue #220 `Move earthquake container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/earthquake `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/220

[atomic-wg] Issue #219 `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/registry `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/219

[atomic-wg] Issue #218 `Move postgresql container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/postgresql `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/218

[atomic-wg] Issue #223 `Move container-best-practices container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/container-best-practices `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/223

[atomic-wg] Issue #208 `Move mariadb container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/mariadb `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/208

[atomic-wg] Issue #207 `Move couchdb container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/couchdb `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/207

[atomic-wg] Issue #212 `Move qpid container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/qpid `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/212

[atomic-wg] Issue #213 `Move atpmic_scan_openscap container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/atomic_scan_openscap `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/213

[atomic-wg] Issue #214 `Move tools container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/tools `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/214

[atomic-wg] Issue #213 `Move atpmic_scan_openscap container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

The status of the issue: `Move atpmic_scan_openscap container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Duplicate by maxamillion. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/213 ___ cloud mailing

Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

Hello all, On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the first ever Fedora Layered Image Release. Each Container Image is released with the following streams which aim to provide lifecycle management choices to our users: Name

Re: Ownership of the Cloud Base Image

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > After some discussions with mattdm and sgallagh about the cloud base > image and the server WG we have decided for now to leave the cloud > base image out of the server WG. Obviously it doesn't make sense to > have it stay

[atomic-wg] Issue #215 `Move redis httpd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

The issue: `Move redis httpd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by maxamillion. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/215 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #225 `Review Container Request for owncload (replacement of Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub)`

maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Note that the Review Requiest in from jhogarth would replace the owncloud Dockerfile from GitHub. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/225

[atomic-wg] Issue #219 `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

The issue: `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been reset by maxamillion. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/219 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

[atomic-wg] Issue #219 `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

The status of the issue: `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed by maxamillion. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/219 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #219 `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` bowlofeggs has already started a review request for the registry: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420568 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/219

[atomic-wg] Issue #219 `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit`

The issue: `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by maxamillion. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/219 ___ cloud mailing list --

Re: Fedora Atomic WG Workflow Proposal

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Adam Miller <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Adam Miller > <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> Hello all, >> Recently I attempted to start a mailing list thread that was the >>

Re: Proposal to test AMIs using Autocloud

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Sayan Chowdhury wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to move the testing functionality to test AMIs from > fedimg to Autocloud. Right now, the fedimg just runs the /bin/true > command to test if the AMIs is proper or not. Therefore, I am

No Two Week Atomic Host this cycle

Hello all, There have not been any composes that have passed all AutoCloud Tests this Two-Week cycle and we will therefore be deferring release until the next cycle. The main blocker bug is being worked on[0]. Thank you, -AdamM [0] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353688

Re: Don't overwrite Two Week Atomic (Ticket #147)

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Adam Miller <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hello all, > I just wanted to throw out a note to everyone that I've gotten a chance > to work on this[0] and pending some testing we should be good to go for next > Two Week Atomic R

Re: overlayfs for AFTER Fedora 25

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After > discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they recommend > waiting to move to overlayfs as the default in F26. > > I think this will work

Announcing Fedora Atomic "latest" download URLs

Hello all, On behalf of the Fedora Cloud Working Group, I am happy to announce that we now have a persistent point of download for users who would like to simply reference a single URL for scripting purposes or otherwise. There is also a companion set of URLs that provide the image name that

Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

Hello all, I was recently discussing some items around docker layered image release process in the future with Randy (bowlofeggs) and Patrick (puiterwijk). As a side effect of our discussion there were two questions I wanted to ask of the Cloud WG: 1) Do we want to maintain docker images for

Re: Cloud and Server Q

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > On 30/09/16, Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 09/30/2016 02:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> > 16:44:56 Cloud base image is the only blocking deliverable. >> > 16:44:59 Atomic is not. >> > >> > I realize this WG is in the middle of

No Two Week Atomic Release

Hello all, I just wanted to post a quick update that there has not been a compose that passed all AutoCloud testing criteria for release in the past two weeks. It appears that the Vagrant libvirt images are failing. We will try again for a release next Two Week window. Thank you, -AdamM

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > This notification still seems broken. That page says: > > The latest two week build did not meet our testing criteria. The > images available are from over 22 days ago. Check the Project Atomic > blog for updates and

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Adam Miller <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> > wrote: >> This notification still seems broken. That page says: >> >> The latest two week bui

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Adam Miller <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Adam Miller > <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> >> wrot

Don't overwrite Two Week Atomic (Ticket #147)

Hello all, I just wanted to throw out a note to everyone that I've gotten a chance to work on this[0] and pending some testing we should be good to go for next Two Week Atomic Release ... however, this is going to cause issues where the download link is broken for an unknown period of time

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/29/2016 03:03 PM, Adam Miller wrote: >> Hello all, >> I was recently discussing some items around docker layered image >> release process in the future with Randy (bowlofeggs)

Re: [atomic-devel] Announcing Fedora Atomic "latest" download URLs

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/29/2016 08:18 AM, Adam Miller wrote: >> On behalf of the Fedora Cloud Working Group, I am happy to >> announce that we now have a persistent point of download for users who >> wou

Re: Cloud and Server Q

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:16:15PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > think QA clearly understands what cloud image(s) are release blocking, >> > as previously they were just the non-atomic images. >> Which images

Re: Cloud and Server Q

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:16:15PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > think QA clearly understands what cloud image(s) are release blocking, >> > as previously they were just the non-atomic images. >> Which images

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:06:41AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: >> For layered images, we would follow something similar to: >> >> registry.fedoraproject

Re: [atomic-devel] Announcing Fedora Atomic "latest" download URLs

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/30/2016 08:58 AM, Adam Miller wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 09/29/2016 08:18 AM, Adam Miller wrote: >>>> On b

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:43:55PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: >> > I'm not sure we should put base distro and distro version as the >> > primary distinguisher. As a user, it's th

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Adam Miller <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller > <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:43:55PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: >>> > I'm not sure we shoul

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: >> The main thing that concern I have is that with modularity there is >> going to be a concept of "base runtime"

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:31 PM, wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

  1   2   >