On 07/19/2017 09:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> I agree maybe I could have done more, but I maintain that I didn't do
>> anything
>> incorrect. It would be great if we actually notified when there are issues
>>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 07/19/2017 08:49 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
You worded it differently to that, it was a known problem, they were
having issues rebuilding due to the breakage in s390x, so it was
already in progress.
>>>
On 07/19/2017 08:49 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> You worded it differently to that, it was a known problem, they were
>>> having issues rebuilding due to the breakage in s390x, so it was
>>> already in progress.
>>
>> Can you help explain to me what I did wrong?
>>
>> AFAIK I found a problem
>> You worded it differently to that, it was a known problem, they were
>> having issues rebuilding due to the breakage in s390x, so it was
>> already in progress.
>
> Can you help explain to me what I did wrong?
>
> AFAIK I found a problem and opened a bug against the correct component.
> I had
On 07/18/2017 11:28 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Bug is already filed against the correct component. This is just an FYI.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472573
>
This is resolved with last nights ostree compose:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20609382
On 07/19/2017 07:55 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> You worded it differently to that, it was a known problem, they were
> having issues rebuilding due to the breakage in s390x, so it was
> already in progress.
Can you help explain to me what I did wrong?
AFAIK I found a problem and opened a
On 07/19/2017 04:12 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> Bug is already filed against the correct component. This is just an FYI.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472573
>
> You've got the wrong end of the
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Bug is already filed against the correct component. This is just an FYI.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472573
You've got the wrong end of the stick, nothing provides
libxenctrl.so.4.8 because xen was