It may also (conceptually) be because routers are dedicated to users
(a router per isolated network or VPC, for example), whereas CPVM and
SSVM provide management services for your cloud. systemvm routers used
to be placed under a section with the CPVM and SSVMs, I think it was
decided to break the
Hi,
That is probably true, Wei.
Do you know, though, if that is something we should separate in the GUI
because it makes sense to do so from a user's point of view or are we doing
it for our own (developer) "convenience?"
Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I
Mike,
I think it is because the processing of virtual routers (start,
stop,reboot,destroy) are different from SSVM and CPVM.
You can have a look at the source code, such as StartRouterCmd.java and
StartSystemVMCmd.java
Wei
2013/3/7 Mike Tutkowski
> Hi,
>
> In the Infrastructure tab of the GUI
