Fair call Anthony for not having it in the UI.
I think the bigger issue which we all forgot to point in the first place was CS
not logging that the hosts were discarded for allocation because it lacked hvm
capability whereas the template/iso required it.
I had to read the code to figure that out
Done, thanks.
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15551
On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Anthony Xu wrote:
> Please file a bug for this,
>
> Thanks,
> Anthony
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebc...@me.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:52 PM
>> To: cloudstack-
Please file a bug for this,
Thanks,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebc...@me.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:52 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Deploying using ISOs
>
> I think the global option would be best (easiest for m
I think the global option would be best (easiest for majority of users). Also,
the documentation for disabling HVM in the db
(http://docs.cloudstack.org/Knowledge_Base/How_to_use_CloudStack_without_Hardware_Virtualization)
should be updated as well to atleast mention the need to update template
We removed HVM from UI intentionally due to following reasons,
1. most users may not know what's HVM, it is confusing.
2. for vmware, it doesn't care about HVM, it can boot any OS on any x86_64 host.
3. for kvm, HVM support is required.
So it is hard for user to configure hvm for template/iso.
And
Celeb - could you please open a UI bug for this @
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa ? The UI should have an option
to mark/unmark the template/iso hvm while registering it. The api already
provides that.
Thanks,
-Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebc...
On 7/11/12 6:02 AM, "Donal Lafferty" wrote:
>Does anyone have experience using the "details" optional parameter of
>RegisterTemplate? I'm wondering what the limits are to the 'Details'
>optional field.
>The background is that I've run into a couple of instances where people
>want to spin up VMs
Great, thanks, that's exactly what it was. VM started fine this time.
On Jul 11, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> Yah, that's the problem. All the templates/ISOs uploaded through UI, are
> marked as HVM enabled by default, while your hypervisor doesn't support HVM,
> then you can't create
Yah, that's the problem. All the templates/ISOs uploaded through UI, are marked
as HVM enabled by default, while your hypervisor doesn't support HVM, then you
can't create VM.
You can hack the DB, by "update vm_template set hvm=0", then try to create the
VM again. But you need to make sure, your
Guest OS is CentOS, I've tried setting it to CentOS 6 (what it is), CentOS 5.6,
and CentOS 5.3 (what the CentOS 5.6 template uses) and it still does not work.
My hypervisor is Xenserver 6 without HVM support (test environment, using older
hardware).
On Jul 11, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Edison Su wro
I was wondering the same thing, but if using an ISO requires HVM support
through Cloudstack. This is my test environment and it does not have HVM
support. The OS I'm trying to load though is CentOS and/or Ubuntu...neither of
which require HVM support. The reason I'm wondering if it requires H
What's the guest os type of your ISO? How about change the guest OS type to
CentOS 5.6 also? Will it work?
And what's your hypervisor? Does your hypervisor host support HVM?
> -Original Message-
> From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebc...@me.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 2:28 AM
> To: cl
What OS is your ISO ? I am wondering that your ISO requires HVM supported host
to run them and your hosts don't have virtualization extensions to run HVM mode
VMs (e.g. any Windows VM)
-Original Message-
From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebc...@me.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 2:58 PM
T
Does anyone have experience using the "details" optional parameter of
RegisterTemplate? I'm wondering what the limits are to the 'Details' optional
field.
The background is that I've run into a couple of instances where people want to
spin up VMs in CloudStack from a template that does not chan
If you are using advanced networking and working with VLANs then you could run
the VPX in a XenServer host outside of the CloudStack but tie it into the same
VLAN as the customers. The only issue with this is that you have to use an
internal IP from the client allocation and hope that the DHCP w
I'm trying to create VMs using ISOs I've uploaded. The ISOs all say they are
ready to be used and they show up fine during instance creation. However, once
I create the instance, I get an error that says "Unable to create a deployment
for VM[User|]". Looking through the logs, it seems like th
16 matches
Mail list logo
