After reading the URLs above it sounds like I can use tags to get what I want...
If I tag a cluster or a primary storage that is related to a
particular cluster - then I could also use the same tag when deploying
Instances to make sure only certain Instances go to a certain cluster
(or primary sto
Bryan,
You can use Tags to tell CloudStack where you would 'like' it to put resources,
but tags are best endeavours.
If you have two clusters, but the one you want to place resources on using Tags
is full, CloudStack will simply allocate the resources to the other cluster.
Regards
Geoff Higgi
So really the only way I can make sure certain hosts get used by a
certain user is to make a separate zone?
Basically, I need to have 2 groups of hosts: on group of hosts that is
dedicated to dev/qa/experimental stuff, the other group of hosts is
production. Looks like I can't just make separate u
Hi,
http://download.cloud.com/releases/3.0.0/api_3.0.0/root_admin/deployVirtualMachine.html
.
ipaddress is the optional parameter with deployVirtualMachine API. This can be
used to set the IP Addr to VM.
I tried with below ex:
http://mangementserverIP:8096/client/api?command=deployVirtual
Out of interest, how much space does an unused 1 Gig disk take up on a
hypervisor?
DL
> -Original Message-
> From: Bjoern Teipel [mailto:bjoern.tei...@internetbrands.com]
> Sent: 16 March 2013 6:12 AM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: diskless boot
>
> Hi guys,
>
>
Thin or thick provisioned? On what type of file system?
Thank you,
Matt
On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:47 PM, "Donal Lafferty" wrote:
> Out of interest, how much space does an unused 1 Gig disk take up on a
> hypervisor?
>
> DL
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bjoern Teipel [mailto:bjoern.t
It also has to be in the range of the IPs that you defined for your guest
networks.
Thank you,
Matt
On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:27 PM, "Sailaja Mada" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://download.cloud.com/releases/3.0.0/api_3.0.0/root_admin/deployVirtualMachine.html
> .
>
> ipaddress is the optional param
Let me rephrase that,
Hi Bjoern,
On the KVM deployment you are using, I take it that the 1 gig disk is a data
disk. It the problem that its unwieldy to manage or that 1 gig takes up too
much room?
Does the 1 gig data disk take up a lot of space on the primary storage?
DL
> -Original Me
How is the correct process of changing permission in
/etc/cloud/management/commands.properties ?
Change the file and restart cloudstack-management or must I do this via an API
call?
Regards
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Montag, 4.
Hi,
Not 100% sure but if you run the VSA within the same cluster CS will kill it
every time you start it unless you deploy it from CS as a template.
So you will either need another host/cluster which runs this VSA for you or you
import it and deploy via CS onto a local storage then setup manuall
Thanks a lot for this information. Is there up to date documentation for CS 4.1
which outlines the supported OS versions or should I be going by what's listed
in the drop down menu on the "Register ISO" form in the management server?
I'd like to put together a cross-reference list of OS which a
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:08:01AM +, Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT) wrote:
> How is the correct process of changing permission in
> /etc/cloud/management/commands.properties ?
> Change the file and restart cloudstack-management or must I do this via an
> API call?
Change the file on all manageme
I use iSCSI on our own SAN that uses drbd to replicate synchronously to
another node. We chose iSCSI because it creates 0% load on the SAN CPU and
has a low memory footprint. NFS is very popular because it allows for thin
provisioning. I benchmarked both, and while IO was about the same, the
CPUs
Hi,
We are trying to create a shared network and a NetScaler LB provider
enabled, and we keep getting the following error :
Cannot specify CIDR when using network offering with external devices
How are we supposed to create such network? Should we not select LB
within the Network Offering, an
Hello,
I've cloudstack 4.0.1 installed and worked with Xen.
I have sever template. Now I want to add a template with CentOS 6.3 with
X server. I can install all but CentOS start only in text mode... Startx
doesn't work. Same thing with Ubuntu 12.04.
Any idea?
Thanks.
Paolo
Hi Donal,
I didn't try thin provisioning on a local LVM disk but I would expect that is
takes only few MB. Does CS support thin on local storage (LVM)?
I can see where you question is going but a data disk,even empty would create a
dependency to the hypervisor.
The idea for using disk less boo
I believe the guest os wants a minimum amount of ram to run the graphical
installer. Try bumping up the memory by installing with a larger service
offering and see if that helps.
Ahmad
On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Paolo De Marco wrote:
> Hello,
> I've cloudstack 4.0.1 installed and worked wit
AFAIK, data disks are by default created in Primary Storage and not on the
hypervisor itself. I take it you want the replacement server for a VM to sit
in a different cluster that does not have access to the same primary storage
Did you mean to ask whether the data disk is a 'dyanmic' hard dri
Il put 4gb but nothing..
text install is not a problem. After this i install x, gnome ecc. ecc..
Then i modify /etc/inittab and set runlevel 5. Reboot but nothing
change... always boot in text mode
If I select "Other Centos 6.0 64bit" I can start install in graphical
mode. I complete the in
Hi Francois,
Is this you are trying to achieve
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/L4-L7+network+services+in+shared+network
?
The code for it is in master branch.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
> -Original Message-
> From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
That's exactly it, for most part :) Our Firewall is not managed by
CloudStack, but our NetScaler is. And since we want to keep the FW to do
the core routing, we need shared networks.
Do you plan to integrate those changes to 4.1 or you target 4.2? I guess
for current and previous versions, we
Hi Francois,
AFAIK, It's not in 4.1. Changes committed to 4.1 got reverted. The feature is
available in master so it eventually makes to 4.2 release.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
> -Original Message-
> From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013
Hi,
I'm trying to use listAsyncJobs API call to detect network creation, but
"com.cloud.api.commands.CreateNetworkCmd" command never appears in async
jobs queue.
Others commands like "com.cloud.api.commands.DeleteNetworkCmd " appears
without problem, but no the creation job!!
Any idea about this
Create network is not an async job, while deletion is.
You could check
http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/api/apidocs-4.0.0/TOC_Root_Admin.html
to know which APIs are async and which are not.
createNetwork just makes a db entry, the network is not implemented when you
fire createNetwork
Thanks Saksham.
2013/3/18 Saksham Srivastava
> Create network is not an async job, while deletion is.
> You could check
> http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/api/apidocs-4.0.0/TOC_Root_Admin.html
> to know which APIs are async and which are not.
> createNetwork just makes a db entry, th
On XenServer, PV mode Linux VMs do not have a virtual video card and are
unable to run X on the console. The console you see in XenCenter and
CloudStack for such VMs is actually a virtual serial console. If you
want to use X on a PV mode Linux VM, set up a VNC server in the VM and
connect directly
I know others have had problems with System VMs not starting, but my logs
appears to be different.
I'm running CS 4.0.1 on a flat network with 2 hosts, a management server,
and a shared storage server. All on CentOS 6.x machines.
After installation it shows me that the primary storage is up, a
At a glance, its seems the management server cant connect to 'host 3'.
Maybe a more full log might surface the exact issue. I'd start by trying to
connect to the host in question from the management server.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:02 PM, wrote:
> I know others have had problems with System VM
I don't even know what 'host 3' would be. My two hosts servers have fully
qualified domain names (and are registered in CS with those names), and
I'm using IP addressing for the NFS share.
The management server can connect to the NFS share as I did that to
download the template as specified in
possible dns resolution issue. can you resolve the hosts provided to
cloudstack from the management server?
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:54 PM, wrote:
> I don't even know what 'host 3' would be. My two hosts servers have fully
> qualified domain names (and are registered in CS with those names),
Not sure if I ran into the same thing you did or not. I am finally up and
running but there are a few variables at play so I am not sure which one
did it for me.
Since you mention you are on CentOS on your hosts I am assuming KVM. I am
using Xen via xcp-xapi on Ubuntu so not sure how much of this
Hi All,
We've finalized the date, its going to be April 10th, 2013, WebMD NYC Location
- which is also in Google's Building @ 111 8th Ave, 7th Floor, NY, 10011 More
details to follow, please help spread the word. This is going to be hands on
demo and talk.
http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-
On 3/18/2013 8:43 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
AFAIK, data disks are by default created in Primary Storage and not on the
hypervisor itself. I take it you want the replacement server for a VM to sit
in a different cluster that does not have access to the same primary storage
Did you mean to ask
Hey guys,
will CS 4.1 support RHEL 6.4 ?
Thanks
Bjoern
Support mean Rhel 6.4 as management server or as KVM host?
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
> -Original Message-
> From: Bjoern Teipel [mailto:bjoern.tei...@internetbrands.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:29 AM
> To: 'Cloudstack users'
> Subject: RHEL 6.4
>
> Hey guys,
>
> will CS 4.1 suppo
Well both but more important KVM host
On 3/18/2013 9:05 PM, Rajesh Battala wrote:
Support mean Rhel 6.4 as management server or as KVM host?
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Bjoern Teipel [mailto:bjoern.tei...@internetbrands.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:29 AM
To:
36 matches
Mail list logo