Hello,
1) How to create distributed index in lucene.If its implemented.?
Will we require to make separate instances of indexes itself, such as adding
docs into diff indexes manually. or are there any modules/functions already
defined.
2) to implement parallel searching using multisearcher.:will
I couldn't find it.
Can you provide more information?
Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience .
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Ben van Klinken wrote:
> One of the overloaded functions of the index searcher exposes the
> unnormalised scores.
>
> Ben
>
> On Monday, August 30, 2010, Onilton Maciel
Hi Veit,
Thank you for the quick response and clarification on how the Query Parser
works. It does help.
-- Mark.
Mark Ashworth
IBM Informix Extensibility Architect
Office phone: +1 (905) 413-5033, TL: 313-5033
Alternate: +1 (905) 697-8094
Notes: Mark Ashworth/Toronto/i...@ibmca
Internet: mail
The problem was caused by redundant NULL test in SegmentMerger::mergeVectors().
termVectorsWriter->addAllDocVectors(tmp) contains code for case tmp is NULL, so
it should be always called
(see fix in intensive_testing branch)
Borek
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben van Klinken [mailto:bva
Hi Ben,
I merged your branch into mine. Now I cannot compile my
code because of changes in your branch - especially
the Term is no longer reference counted.
So I would like to ask - should I change my code in order
to match changes in your branch? (Then it would no longer
be possible to compile
Thanks Ben for quick reply.
I read somewhere , Nutch uses mapper and reducer to do so...but really donno
how to go abt it.
On net I am not able to find gud papers related to it.
If you could provide me the links where I can find more detail abt it.That
would be helpful
has parallel multi sear
One of the overloaded functions of the index searcher exposes the
unnormalised scores.
Ben
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Onilton Maciel wrote:
> Can the similarity of the first result be different from 1? I asking this
> because I think it's normalized with the first result. In this way it would
great news!
my branch (ben_working4) contains a lot more stuff than master. That
will become mastter soon unless a problem is found with it. I believe
we r waiting on some automated tests that someone was running. Either
way please try that branch out as well if you could
cheers
ben
On Wednesday
Try running the index test program in Luke. It may show up more
ben
On Wednesday, September 1, 2010, Veit Jahns wrote:
> 2010/8/23 Kostka Bořivoj :
>> The last test in suite (testHangOnClose) fails on CND_PRECONDITION in
>> SegmentMerger on line 415.
>> Is anybody familiar enough with sement me
Itanar would know more about this, but I thought the query parser IS
used in the new version. Itamar?
On Wednesday, September 1, 2010, Veit Jahns wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> in wildcard queries the tokens are not processed by the analyzer (see
> also [1]). So in your case the searcher will look for ter
First of all have a look at the mpi branch ofclucene. It achieves the
distributed searches.
Nutch is a project which I know does this sort of thing u r looking
at, so I look at the theories of that project may give u some good
ideas.
Good luck and please let us knowhow you go
ben
On Thursday, S
Hello,
I am using Clucene , and want to increase performance.
does clucene something like parallel searching for distributed indexes.
I want to reduce search time , which query takes for searching clucene
indexes.
1. If I can I distribute my indexes such that each index , will have some
doc
12 matches
Mail list logo
