Hi All,
> Why did you put it under clucene-core-unstable on SourceForge?
>
to give you guys a last chance to say yay-or-nay... we should merge my
branch into master if it is good, then we'll do a stable release.
> Are Jens's Solaris fixes also included? It has at also least one
> memory leak---
I have used it in a production environment already. And it's going very
well.
ben
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Ahmed Saidi wrote:
> Great news!
> What is the state of Lucene++? Is it stable?
>
> Ahmed
>
> 2011/3/17, Ben van Klinken :
> > Dear CLuceners
> >
> > It's been a very long time si
