We could consider buggy the caller which asks for the same device name
more than once, without unregistering the first device. But better safe
If they ask for the same name we certainly should. Probably we should
error that request and use WARN_ON() to shame the offender in
kerneloops.org.
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 17:03 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 01:28:36PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:28:17 -0200
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo casca...@holoscopio.com wrote:
The current dynamic allocation of minor number for misc devices
The following patch cleans up the recovery code and fixes a few
bugs along the way. The bugs are:
o An incorrect assumption about the size of the journal
o An issue where the superblock was being used to store variables
local to the recovery process which would cause a problem if
multiple
When a gfs2 filesystem is grown, it needs to rebuild the rindex list to be able
to use the new space. gfs2 does this when the rindex is marked not uptodate,
which happens when the rindex glock is dropped. However, on a single node
setup, there is never any reason to drop the rindex glock, so
