Hi,
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 15:12 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 09:41:35AM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
We don't need to look up the lockspace in this particular
case since we already have a pointer to it (which was being
dereferenced in order to do the lookup in
On 17/02/10 20:29, David Teigland wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 01:23:39PM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
While investigating Red Hat bug #537010 I started looking at the dlm's astd
thread. The way in which the cast and bast requests are queued looked
as if it might cause reordering since
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:16:03AM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
I'm not sure what more I can say here this is a sysfs file store
function and one of the reasons for using it is that sysfs looks after
the ref counting for you.
Even aside from that, if you don't have a reference to the
