Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/1 linux-next] GFS2: use BIT() macro

- Original Message - | Replace 1 << value shift by more explicit BIT() macro | | Also fixes two bare unsigned definitions: | | WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' | + unsigned hsize = BIT(ip->i_depth); | | Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick

[Cluster-devel] GFS2: Patches pulled, linux-gfs2.git rebased

Hi, Linus has pulled the latest set of patches from the for-next branch of the linux-gfs2.git tree, so I rebased the tree from Linus's master. So the current tree is back to having no unmerged GFS2 patches. Regards, Bob Peterson Red Hat File Systems

Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v2 RESEND] fs: return EPERM on immutable inode

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 07:58:28PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > In most cases, EPERM is returned on immutable inode, and there're only a > few places returning EACCES. I noticed this when running LTP on > overlayfs, setxattr03 failed due to unexpected EACCES on immutable > inode. > > So converting