On Thu, 2023-07-06 at 10:16 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Jeff Layton writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 14:58 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > v2:
> > > - prepend patches to add missing ctime updates
> > > - add simple_rename_timestamp helper function
> > > - rename ctime accessor functions
Jeff Layton writes:
> On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 14:58 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> v2:
>> - prepend patches to add missing ctime updates
>> - add simple_rename_timestamp helper function
>> - rename ctime accessor functions as inode_get_ctime/inode_set_ctime_*
>> - drop individual
On Wed 05-07-23 14:58:12, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Now that everything in-tree is converted to use the accessor functions,
> rename the i_ctime field in the inode to discourage direct access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara
On Wed 05-07-23 15:01:12, Jeff Layton wrote:
> In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is
> used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
> inode->i_ctime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara
On Wed 05-07-23 14:58:11, Jeff Layton wrote:
> A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Add
> a function that handles the details sanely, and convert the libfs.c
> callers to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan
