On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 01:19 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:58:11PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > + * POSIX mandates that the old and new parent directories have their ctime
> > and
> > + * mtime updated, and that inodes of @old_dentry and @new_dentry (if any),
> > have
> >
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:58:11PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> + * POSIX mandates that the old and new parent directories have their ctime
> and
> + * mtime updated, and that inodes of @old_dentry and @new_dentry (if any),
> have
> + * their ctime updated.
APPLICATION USAGE
Some
On Wed 05-07-23 14:58:11, Jeff Layton wrote:
> A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Add
> a function that handles the details sanely, and convert the libfs.c
> callers to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan
On Thu, 2023-07-06 at 08:19 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 7/6/23 03:58, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Add
> > a function that handles the details sanely, and convert the libfs.c
> > callers to use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff
On 7/6/23 03:58, Jeff Layton wrote:
> A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Add
> a function that handles the details sanely, and convert the libfs.c
> callers to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton
> ---
> fs/libfs.c | 36
A rename potentially involves updating 4 different inode timestamps. Add
a function that handles the details sanely, and convert the libfs.c
callers to use it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton
---
fs/libfs.c | 36 +++-
include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++
2 files
