On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:33:48AM +, Christine Caulfield wrote:
> Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > as discussed and agreed at the Cluster Summit we need to split our tree
> > to make life easier in the long run (etc. etc.).
Thanks for taking this on Fabio.
> > = third app
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 11:25 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:02, Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:52 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:52, Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > There is act
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:52 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:52, Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 15:57 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> > I'd have thought fence.git
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 15:57 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > I'd have thought fence.git and fence-agents.git in one and cman.git
> > and rgmanager.git in another.
> > But I may be missing some of the interdependencies.
>
> I wouldn'
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 22:11 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 18:37, Joel Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:25:30AM -0600, David Teigland wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:18:13AM +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> >> > At this point we haven'
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 11:25 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:18:13AM +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> > At this point we haven't really settled how many (sub) project will be
> > created out of this split. This will come once we agree how to split.
>
> I like the third op
David Teigland wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I'd have thought fence.git and fence-agents.git in one and cman.git
and rgmanager.git in another.
But I may be missing some of the interdependencies.
I wouldn't mind either of those combinations. Maybe rgman
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I'd have thought fence.git and fence-agents.git in one and cman.git
> and rgmanager.git in another.
> But I may be missing some of the interdependencies.
I wouldn't mind either of those combinations. Maybe rgmanager's last
stand wi
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:25:30AM -0600, David Teigland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:18:13AM +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> > At this point we haven't really settled how many (sub) project will be
> > created out of this split. This will come once we agree how to split.
>
> I like the t
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:18:13AM +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> At this point we haven't really settled how many (sub) project will be
> created out of this split. This will come once we agree how to split.
I like the third option as long as the number of new git trees doesn't
explode (obviou
Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> as discussed and agreed at the Cluster Summit we need to split our tree
> to make life easier in the long run (etc. etc.).
>
> We need to decide how we want to do it and there are different
> approaches to that. I was able to think of 3. There might be
Hi,
I'm not so keen on option #2, but aside from that I have no strong
opinions,
Steve.
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 10:18 +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> as discussed and agreed at the Cluster Summit we need to split our tree
> to make life easier in the long run (etc. etc.).
>
>
Hi everybody,
as discussed and agreed at the Cluster Summit we need to split our tree
to make life easier in the long run (etc. etc.).
We need to decide how we want to do it and there are different
approaches to that. I was able to think of 3. There might be more and I
might not have taken everyt
13 matches
Mail list logo
