Hi David,
On 12/01/2016 12:16 AM, David Teigland wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:07:22PM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
a. Should we put recover_lvb() even before recover_conversion()? if not, why?
Yes, I think you're right. The lvb decision should be made using the
original lock modes, not the
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:07:22PM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
> @@ -852,12 +868,19 @@ void dlm_recover_rsbs(struct dlm_ls *ls)
> if (is_master(r)) {
> if (rsb_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_CONVERT))
> recover_conversion(r);
> +
> +
Hi David,
On 11/16/2016 11:08 PM, David Teigland wrote:
convert(R1, EX)
get LVB
Qustion: what is the LVB then? x or y?
==
Is this a valid question? or am I missing something?
It's a good question, and it's been enough years that the details are now
hazy. I think the current behavior
Hi!
On 11/16/2016 11:08 PM, David Teigland wrote:
convert(R1, EX)
get LVB
Qustion: what is the LVB then? x or y?
==
Is this a valid question? or am I missing something?
It's a good question, and it's been enough years that the details are now
hazy. I think the current behavior
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:42:09PM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 04:29 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
> > Hi David and all,
> >
> > I am debugging an issue of ocfs2 that relates to LVB value. I will try
> > to make it a pure DLM question:
> >
> > Two nodes (N1, N2) try to truncate the same
On 11/16/2016 04:29 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
Hi David and all,
I am debugging an issue of ocfs2 that relates to LVB value. I will try to make it a pure
DLM question:
Two nodes (N1, N2) try to truncate the same file(R1) concurrently.
N1 N2
lock(R1, EX)
Hi David and all,
I am debugging an issue of ocfs2 that relates to LVB value. I will try to make it a pure DLM
question:
Two nodes (N1, N2) try to truncate the same file(R1) concurrently.
N1 N2
lock(R1, EX)
changing LVB: x
