On 2009-11-02T08:41:43, Christine Caulfield ccaul...@redhat.com wrote:
No concurrently active transmission (rrp_mode active) - I wonder if it
is possible to put SCTP into such an mode, or, vice-versa, if this means
the DLM might be better off directly opening several TCP connections on
its
On 31/10/09 00:20, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
Hi all, David,
I'm contemplating SCTP versus OpenAIS/corosync. Is dlm_controld(.pcmk)
pro-actively informed if a single ring/link goes down, as to trigger
faster SCTP recovery - or is it left for SCTP to time out on its own and
proceed?
Corosync
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:41:43AM +, Christine Caulfield wrote:
To be honest, RRP DLM/SCTP is not well tested or used. There are
probably lots of things that could be done to improve it. In particular
the failover aspect of it (the most important part of course) has
probably not been
Hi all, David,
I'm contemplating SCTP versus OpenAIS/corosync. Is dlm_controld(.pcmk)
pro-actively informed if a single ring/link goes down, as to trigger
faster SCTP recovery - or is it left for SCTP to time out on its own and
proceed?
If the latter - is there a way to auto-tune the SCTP
