Hi,
On 09/06/2020 13:41, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I have a modest proposal ...
struct inode {
- struct address_space i_data;
}
+struct minode {
+ struct inode i;
+ struct address_space m;
+};
struct address_space {
- struct inode *host;
}
This saves one pointer
In flush_delete_work, instead of flushing each individual pending
delayed work item, cancel and re-queue them for immediate execution.
The waiting isn't needed here because we're already waiting for all
queued work items to complete in gfs2_flush_delete_work. This makes the
code more efficient,
