On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:06:51PM -0200, cmaiol...@redhat.com wrote:
> The resource groups got corrupted without this patch:
I could see an extraneous bast leading to confusion in gfs2 about the lock
state, but gfs2 should probably be asserting somewhere before it actually
corrupts anything...
>
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:00 +0100, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Lon,
> even it may "logically" seemed that original code is incorrect and your
> patch make sense, it's not the case.
>
> Actually, corosync has 3 transports:
> udp, udpu and iba.
>
> Broadcast is same transport as udp but only has broadcast
From: Carlos Maiolino
with the current check condition: if (gr == lkb), the list will skip not only
basts sent to convertqueue
since gr == lkb could be true on another situations, where such can cause a
gfs2 corruption.
Corruption checked on gfs2 resource groups, adding a file on a node and
r
Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> On 1/4/2011 10:00 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
>> Lon,
>> even it may "logically" seemed that original code is incorrect and your
>> patch make sense, it's not the case.
>>
>> Actually, corosync has 3 transports:
>> udp, udpu and iba.
>>
>> Broadcast is same transport as udp b
On 1/4/2011 10:00 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Lon,
> even it may "logically" seemed that original code is incorrect and your
> patch make sense, it's not the case.
>
> Actually, corosync has 3 transports:
> udp, udpu and iba.
>
> Broadcast is same transport as udp but only has broadcast flag set on.
Lon,
even it may "logically" seemed that original code is incorrect and your
patch make sense, it's not the case.
Actually, corosync has 3 transports:
udp, udpu and iba.
Broadcast is same transport as udp but only has broadcast flag set on.
In other words, this patch is not correct.
Regards,
