Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 5/5] gfs2: dlm based recovery coordination

2011-12-20 Thread David Teigland
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:16:43PM -0500, David Teigland wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:39:08AM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > > I dislike arbitrary delays also, so I'm hesitant to add them. > > > The choices here are: > > > - removing NOQUEUE from the requests below, but with NOQUEUE you

[Cluster-devel] libgfs2: Add beginnings of a metadata description

2011-12-20 Thread Steven Whitehouse
>From f2d72f2786b1fc23188657e767ca754e94d2306c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Whitehouse Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:01:35 + Subject: [PATCH] libgfs2: Add beginnings of a metadata description The intent here is to start a framework which will describe the GFS/GFS2 metadata in enough deta

Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 5/5] gfs2: dlm based recovery coordination

2011-12-20 Thread David Teigland
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:39:08AM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > I dislike arbitrary delays also, so I'm hesitant to add them. > > The choices here are: > > - removing NOQUEUE from the requests below, but with NOQUEUE you have a > > much better chance of killing a mount command, which is a

Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 5/5] gfs2: dlm based recovery coordination

2011-12-20 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 12:47 -0500, David Teigland wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:07:38PM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > > struct lm_lockstruct { > > > int ls_jid; > > > unsigned int ls_first; > > > - unsigned int ls_first_done; > > > unsigned int ls_nodir; > > Since ls_flags a